| ▲ | spudlyo 2 days ago |
| Chrome on Linux is ~1.47 times faster than Firefox on the Jetstream 3 benchmark as recently reported by Phoronix[0]. That's how we want you to spend the money Mozilla, keeping up with your well-funded rival Google, and making it so we don't end up with a browser monoculture. These sorts of distractions just piss me off, and are not part of your core mission. [0]: https://www.phoronix.com/review/firefox-chrome-2026 |
|
| ▲ | exceptione 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I remember that Firefox is orders of magnitude more performant in css processing, especially for complex documents with many elements. Can't comment on the javascipt interpeter, so I assume firefox is losing points somewhere else outside the screen painting engine. |
| |
|
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | p-e-w 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Firefox has many weaknesses, but I never once thought “man, that thing is slow”. It isn’t, and chasing benchmark numbers is a waste of effort. A better security model or deeper customizability would be far more valuable. |
| |
| ▲ | Zardoz84 2 days ago | parent [-] | | The fact it's that for a normal usage, Firefox with uBlock Origin it's faster that Chrome without ad blocking. On Android this is especially noticeable. | | |
| ▲ | Barbing 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I wonder how much slower Firefox would have to be to invalidate the mental health gain not imagining every single keystroke going directly to Sundar. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ramon156 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Ladybird soon™ |
| |
| ▲ | panzi 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Not nearly soon enough. But yes, there is hope. Far away hope, but still. |
|
|
| ▲ | eipi10_hn 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why is this related to Firefox? |
| |
| ▲ | JCTheDenthog 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Because Mozilla is wasting money on something other than their core product, once again. | | |
| ▲ | eipi10_hn 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Thunderbird is under MZLA Technologies Corporation, their money and resources are unrelated to Mozilla Corporation, who pays money for their Firefox. | | |
| ▲ | spudlyo 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I’m not sure if it’s fair to describe a "wholly owned subsidiary" as unrelated. > Thunderbolt is funded through a dedicated investment from Mozilla and is being developed by a separate team focused on enterprise AI products, distinct from Thunderbird’s donation-supported consumer product work. Emphasis mine. | | |
| ▲ | eipi10_hn 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, it's unrelated. Each one has its own resources and roadmaps. They are totally not dependent on each other. Thunderbird and its roadmaps/projects are not affected by Firefox' earnings at all. One's development doesn't affect the others. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | clumsysmurf 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And regarding (memory) performance, chromium has the "memory saver" settings for unloading tabs. I don't understand why mozilla thinks its acceptable to require users unload tabs manually. Who even does that? |
| |
| ▲ | Erenay09 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I use the about:memory tab whenever I need to clear some memory. However, it can't unload tabs. |
|
|
| ▲ | whalesalad 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |