Extra? I thought they were clearly violating IP law to begin with. Unless I misunderstand this is "water is wet" territory (both the judgment as well as what Anna's Archive did).

▲

mhitza 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Extra, because with the piracy of music they bought into equation members of (and implicitly) the recording industry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_Industry_Association...

▲

shevy-java 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I do not see any law being violated by Anna's Archive in the slightest.

▲

gertop 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Just because you disagree with a law doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. You anti copyright shills are exhausting... Why can't you try to attract people to your side to eventually instead effect some real change? Do you just take that much pleasure in being an edgelord that your cause be damned?

▲

bulbar 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Just use it to train / tune a LLM. Apparently, everything becomes legal if you only put the stuff into the right kind of software.

That's at least what many people like to argue here on HN.

	▲	Cider9986 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Anna's wants[1] companies to train on their data. [1] https://annas-archive.gl/blog/ai-copyright.html

▲

ndsipa_pomu 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Water isn't wet, but it does "wet" other things. Wetness is the degree to which a liquid contacts and adheres to a solid surface, so it's makes no sense to say that water is wet.