Remix.run Logo
mindslight 5 hours ago

Isn't this just the routine fascist playbook at this point? Start by declaring that the law doesn't even apply to them, on whatever flimsiest of bases.

Personally I would really like to see torts for attorneys who willfully promulgate blatantly incorrect legal interpretations - they're effectively providing incorrect legal advice. A non-attorney is likely to believe such advice coming from a member of the Bar, and the net goal is to discourage the target from seeking further legal advice.

SoftTalker 5 hours ago | parent [-]

An attorney whom you have not engaged in counsel is not providing legal advice.

mindslight 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm well aware of how it's currently legally defined - hence "effectively". My comment is in the context of what ought, not what is.