| ▲ | radicalbyte 8 hours ago | |||||||
Russia is far larger and far less populated, it's an economic backwater and a cultural dead end. Yet despite that they have rail connecting their country together. | ||||||||
| ▲ | hirako2000 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
So did France. There is a common factor at play with Russia. Has little to do with the country's shape. It's like saying certain rats solve the maze because the path is simpler. Except that the failing rats happen to have a different incentive. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | nephihaha 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Once you get past the Urals, most of Russia's development is along an east west axis until you reach Baikal and the the far east. Also as a Marxist dictatorship for some years, there was little emphasis on independent travel (cars etc) To call Russia a "cultural dead end" is a bit much, considering all the great artists of various kinds that country has produced. In fact, you'll find that famous Russian novels like Anna Karenina and Doctor Zhivago feature trains as motifs. | ||||||||
| ||||||||