I just spent some time with the s3 protocol and I agree completely. What should have been able to leverage the simplifying assumptions turned into another hodgepodge. It’s not like nfs is a real shining example of simplicity either. I’ve never worked with p9, but potentially that aside I think we really failed to come up with a decent distributed file model,

▲

jen20 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It was simple(ish) 20 years ago, to be fair.

▲

thayne an hour ago | parent [-]

Simpler than it is now, but the authentication system was never simple. You can't just put a bearer token in the authorization header, you have to follow a complicated algorithm to sign the request. That made some sense 20 years ago when s3 didn't use tls to protect against a mitm that changed the changed the request. It is less valuable now when you use tls.

▲

crote an hour ago | parent [-]

Isn't the whole signed request part a hard requirement for 3rd party access? S3 was originally designed for web use, which means giving not-fully-trusted browsers some access to your storage bucket.

You can't exactly do "this client is allowed to download this one specific file for the next 24 hours (but not use it like their personal CDN and share the link with everyone)" or "this client is allowed to upload a single image file up to 10MB (but not upload a 100GB copy of Friends)" with basic bearer tokens.

	▲	eddythompson80 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Of course you can do all that with a basic bearer token. It’s just a signed json object with an expiration