Please suggest one, but ideally three, things that you think that overturning Wickard would lead to that would cause K, S & J to vote against doing so?

▲

giantg2 a day ago | parent [-]

The federal civil rights act of 1964 is probably a good one. The clean air act is another. Probably others like consumer protection laws, healthcare regulations, safety laws (OSHA), etc. These are all based on the expanded powers from wickard v fillburn. If portions of these were challenged and overturned, I believe those justices would not view that as a good thing.

	▲	hellojesus a day ago \| parent [-]
		Isn't OSHA already unconstitutional under current implementation due to competing intelligible principles? I agree they won't do it, but they absolutely should.