The federal civil rights act of 1964 is probably a good one. The clean air act is another. Probably others like consumer protection laws, healthcare regulations, safety laws (OSHA), etc. These are all based on the expanded powers from wickard v fillburn. If portions of these were challenged and overturned, I believe those justices would not view that as a good thing.

Isn't OSHA already unconstitutional under current implementation due to competing intelligible principles?

I agree they won't do it, but they absolutely should.