Sounds like a shareholder lawsuit coming in 3, 2, 1.

fmbb 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

How or why though?

Zuckerberg has unique power among CEOs in public companies. He controls the board and he owns a majority of voting shares.

Sure they can theoretically sue him for some kind of gross mismanagement of the company or disloyalty, but why would the owner class do that? Investors are all in on AI replacing human workers. If they think Zuckerberg doing this is wrong, they would imply AI should not work in place of humans.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		> they can theoretically sue him for some kind of gross mismanagement of the company or disloyalty They can really only sue for breach of fiduciary duty. Zuckerberg controls the majority, but there are still limits on abusing the minority. I’m not sure making an AI clone falls afoul of any rules.

▲

roywiggins 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Meta spent 100 billion dollars on VR, what's a Zuckerbot or two?