| ▲ | alex_young 3 hours ago |
| <10% of natural gas plants recover helium. All of them extract it. The remaining >90% vent it into the atmosphere. This is an engineering / money problem, not a physics problem. |
|
| ▲ | jandrese 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It becomes a larger problem as the world moves away from fossil fuels like natural gas. I'm not a chemist but are there really no alternatives? Running fusion plants to make helium seems very unlikely to become cost effective, but it would be quite the sci-fi future if we filled party balloons by bombarding hydrogen with free protons. I guess there aren't any easy molecules to break apart to get helium either since its a noble gas. No hydrolyses type solutions because there aren't any molecules that incorporate helium. I guess radioactive decay, but even that is ultimately limited over long enough timescales. |
| |
| ▲ | triceratops 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > it would be quite the sci-fi future if we filled party balloons by bombarding hydrogen How dangerous are party balloons filled with hydrogen? Not a whole balloon arch obviously. | | |
| ▲ | jandrese 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I had a science teacher that did this in class, then taped a match on the end of a yardstick and held it under the balloon. They made quite a bang. I wouldn't want to be right next to it when it went off. | | |
| ▲ | triceratops 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah I've seen that demonstration in school too. But if the teacher was willing to do it in school, with kids, how dangerous was it really? | | |
| ▲ | Neywiny an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Along with the other commenter, I'll add that a classroom is usually a lot bigger than a home dining room or other domestic party locations. That size also helps things dissipate instead of reflect. Not sure by how much but I'm sure it does something. | |
| ▲ | cyberax an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can get permanent hearing damage from that demonstration if you stand right next to that balloon. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | cubefox 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > It becomes a larger problem as the world moves away from fossil fuels like natural gas. I actually remember a similar problem from some compound that was mainly formed as a byproduct of some old Canadian nuclear reactor design. As the tech gets phased out, the material is no longer available in significant quantities, with consequences for a projects that need it (like Iter). Some things can be cheap if they are produced as a byproduct, but very expensive if they have to be obtained directly. |
|
|
| ▲ | kakacik 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| As usual - 'there is scarcity of XYZ' -> price it accordingly, and markets will align quickly. Dont expecr private companies to have long term thinking, thats not how bonuses for those steering the wheel are set up. |