|
| ▲ | Aurornis 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| > I am worried about the inequality created for the kids if I am strict about rules, but other parents are not. Different families can choose to raise their children differently. Please let other parents make their own parenting choices for their own kids. There are parents who are more strict with their kids than you are in ways you don’t agree with. I guarantee you wouldn’t be happy if they were lobbying to force your kids to obey their chosen set of rules because they didn’t want “inequality”. |
| |
|
| ▲ | crote 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If those restrictions are so good for children, wouldn't it be in your interest to enforce them - even when other parents do not? Or are you worried about your kids getting an unfair advantage over unrestricted ones? |
|
| ▲ | Nevermark 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > That's why it is in my interest if other (lazier) parents are forced to comply. You don't need to worry about "lazier". I don't think that exists in the context of your concerns. |
|
| ▲ | 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | -create-account 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If your passport leaks, they can [create a bank account]
This seems like a country-specific problem. In Japan, even if opening an online bank account, a photocopy of a passport is simply insufficient to pass identity verification. Additionally, most country passports contain an IC chip that can be used for attestation. Any eKYC system that does not attempt reading data from the IC chip is fundamentally broken.It should be a total non-issue for photocopies of passports to get leaked. |
|
| ▲ | mosselman 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You should be concerned about a government issuing these ridiculous and dangerous controls on what you can do in society. Not whether, within that dystopia it is fair to submit in one way or another. Also, kids understand perfectly well that different parents have different rules. I don’t think the government or Apple should be responsible for protecting you from mopey teenagers by blocking free internet access for everyone just so that it “is fair”. Are you even hearing yourself? |
|
| ▲ | selfsigned 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| But are you not worried about the democratic precedent that treating citizens as de-facto minors and arbitrarily withholding information, with little to no oversight, will set? And your kids seeing the fully realized end of that slippery slope ? What if your government decides that anything LGBT is taboo for kids[1]? Or that informations about say, ongoing genocides, is deemed too graphic for kids.
Won't that also increase the blast radius to people who didn't bother justifying their age, even though they supposedly also have the right to vote? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Parental_Rights_in_Edu... |
