| ▲ | stinkbeetle 4 hours ago | |||||||
Is this really true? What is the evidence that Trump succeeded in money laundering, where is the dirty money coming from in these particular bets, and how do you propose the polymarket betting mechanism is able to clean the money? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Spooky23 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
A1: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-deutsch... A2: I don’t know. It would be great if the Department of Justice or Treasury investigated the matter, since the SEC no longer has the capability. However, since the interim Attorney General is a simp who expresses his love for the president repeatedly, that’s unlikely. A3: Polymarket could make an effort to prevent activity that undermines the integrity of their platform. All betting platforms work to detect the use of the platforms by people like Baseball players and their families. Most public employees names are public, so it should not be impossible to do the same. The fact that obvious behavior like this happens reflects poorly on the platform. It’s pretty incredible that bettors are stupid enough to use a platform that actively undermines their wagers. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | arcastroe 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> how do you propose the polymarket betting mechanism is able to clean the money? I would assume that dirty money (from dirty wallets) is placed on the "losing side" of the bet. And clean accounts take the "winning side" of the bets. | ||||||||