| ▲ | foxglacier 3 hours ago | |
Solving poverty and inequality is for the short term - they'll come back and need solving again no matter how many times you already solved them. But once the stars are explored, they stay explored forever. So yea, that's moving forwards and the other isn't. | ||
| ▲ | westmeal 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The closest stars are way too far to reach on any reasonable timescale. That's not even mentioning the fact that moving forwards is a vague goal. Moving forwards towards what exactly? And if the US government got off of it's ass to... Oh I don't know, maybe fix the bullshit healthcare system we have and help people with tax money instead of bombing people for Israel things would improve quite a bit in a very short time. That's assuming we don't bomb each other over terroritorial squabbles first. In any case I don't really understand your defeatism when it comes to inequality but when it's something as difficult as interstellar space travel you seem to be optimistic. | ||
| ▲ | hackable_sand 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
They are both moving forward. Moving forward on a circle is moving forward. What crack are you guys smoking? | ||