|
| ▲ | microtonal 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Someone can probably make a valid "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" out of Copilot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffal... |
|
| ▲ | mrbonner 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You're talking about the aladeen or that aladeen? I don't understand which aladeen you are talking about. |
|
| ▲ | GolfPopper 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You could try Copilot Copilot for Windows with Windows Copilot. I know it's still got Copilot in it, but not as much as Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot MS Office for Windows Copilot. |
| |
|
| ▲ | SXX 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Copilot Copilot Copilot Copilot |
| |
| ▲ | bryanrasmussen 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I guess it does sort of work as a "grammatical infinity" idea
https://medium.com/luminasticity/cardinality-and-growth-rate... Like an imperative, because copilot can exist as a verb, I copilot a plane, and Copilot can exist as a software product, and as a helper in a software product that is itself a software product that helps you use the software product it is a helper to So Copilot copilot! could be an imperative for Copilot to Copilot, and Copilot Copilot could be a description of a software product that helps people use a software product named Copilot, but the second is not really grammatically correct as a sentence, whereas the imperative is. So in the end I guess you could have a
Copilot Copilot..[infinite Copilots]..copilot! | |
| ▲ | unangst 16 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Copilot copilots Copilot copilots copilot copilot Copilot copilots | | |
| ▲ | simonw 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Woah that actually works... Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots, which other Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots assist, themselves assist Microsoft-Copilot-branded copilots. | |
| ▲ | x______________ 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I just woke up, please for the love of ai slop, stop before you break my definition of the word copilot! (Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..) | | |
| ▲ | MarsIronPI 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > (Fun fact: If you repeat a word sufficiently, it will lose its meaning..) Too late. Microsoft already caused that to happen. | |
| ▲ | tkrn 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | After reading this thread, my brain is now convinced that copilots are actually some sort of small South American mammals. I think I'll stick to that definition; I don't want to lose my mental image of the daft-looking little copilots roaming around the Inter-Andean valleys that their more menacing-looking ancestors once inhabited. Yeah, cute little things. |
|
| |
| ▲ | adharmad 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo |
|
|
| ▲ | 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
