Remix.run Logo
Delve removed from Y Combinator(ycombinator.com)
118 points by carabiner 3 hours ago | 52 comments
maxbond 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I'm getting the impression that a lot of people in this thread think this is because they violated an open-source license and saying things to the effect of, "they're just the ones who got caught". I also thought that was the scandal initially. (And when it comes to license violations, yes, there's absolutely more where that came from.)

But that's just the cherry on top. I don't think they're being thrown out because they violated a license. There are really serious fraud allegations. Allegedly they were rubber-stamping noncompliant customers, leaving them exposed to potential criminal liability under regulations like HIPPA.

https://deepdelver.substack.com/p/delve-fake-compliance-as-a...

I've only skimmed this so I do not endorse these allegations, but I think it's context missing from this discussion.

thoughthadlogin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sure, most companies could add an About section and probably put this behind them pretty quickly. They could have even hired someone like Delve to assure this kind of thing wouldn’t happen again.

But Delve themselves can’t really do any of that. They’ve screwed up on a fundamental piece of their own business model. Their core offering *is* Compliance as a Service!

How could I trust their word that they’ll ensure my company is compliant? How could I trust their word that a company I’m doing business with is compliant? They can’t even handle their own Apache 2.0 licensed works, and that’s child’s play- relatively speaking. I’m supposed to trust that they can handle PCI and HIPPA and all the rest for other companies?

This is like having a dentist who doesn’t brush and floss their own teeth. Or a building inspector working out of a moldy office suite with exposed rebar. Or an editor with a personal website full of typos and grammatical errors. It’s a dealbreaker to anyone with common sense.

borski an hour ago | parent [-]

You’re right, you can’t.

Unlike Zenefits, which had (allegedly?) committed fraud for part of their business in the interest of moving faster, and then Parker came back with Rippling…

These guys’ entire and actual business model was fraud.

hbbio 5 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This other profile is still up:

https://www.forbes.com/profile/delve/

30U30 never ceases to amaze.

everfrustrated 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Someone leaked an internal Bookface chat from Garry Tan (YC CEO) saying:

  We have asked Delve to leave YC.

  YC is a community, not just an accelerator. The founders in our community have to trust each other, and we have to trust them. When that trust breaks down, there's really only one thing to do.

  We're not going to get into the details publicly. We wish them well.
https://x.com/___4o____/status/2040271468874076380

I have no direct knowledge of the accuracy of any of this. This is not my account.

gnabgib 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Related: Delve allegedly forked an open-source tool and sold it as its own (295 points, yesterday, 153 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615434

wenbin 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Curious - in this situation, does delve return money to YC? Or YC simply writes off the investment

sandeepkd 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Its quite ironical and interesting at the same time, seems like there is a threshold size/impact beyond which everyone would come and save you, anything less and you will have to bear the consequences.

jaredsohn an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Interestingly, they show up in the company list. When you click the link it returns 404.

https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/?query=delve

cyrusradfar an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Related from an hour earlier: Delve removed from YC website [archive.org] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47634405

ChrisArchitect an hour ago | parent [-]

an example of why to avoid archive links in submissions (save 'em for comments), because the source link here will win.

mememememememo 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

404s for me

bcraven 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I think that's the point - they have been removed.

OptionOfT 5 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

That's the point.

bilalq an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

While I do think Delve and the leadership there should be held responsible, it's a bit weird to see YC and others take shots at them for breaking the law when so many of their prized unicorns achieved what they did by being willing to just ignore laws and deal with the consequences later.

borski an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Ignoring a law is different from knowingly and intentionally breaking the law, especially when that law is actual intentional fraud.

Also, there was no “endgame.” They weren’t trying to change the law; they were exclusively breaking it for profit.

bilalq an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Let me more clearly instead say that many successful startups knowingly and intentionally broke the law.

But I agree that Delve is a special case and should naturally be held to a higher standard here because their whole business is around being compliant with the law. When most other startups break the law, they do it to get an advantage over competition. Delve did it in a way that sacrificed their core value towards customers.

borski an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah, precisely.

afavour 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Ignoring a law is different from knowingly and intentionally breaking the law

This is something Airbnb has facilitated for a very long time, no? And Uber, back when it started.

From a legal perspective I don’t see that it matters whether you’re trying to change the law or not. You’re either following it or breaking it.

borski 22 minutes ago | parent [-]

Sure. Technically and legally, you’re right.

In reality, it makes quite a difference if public opinion is on your side or not.

“We decided to commit fraud by providing fake compliance reports” reads very differently from “we let homeowners make money by renting a room”

TurdF3rguson an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Ignoring a law is different from knowingly and intentionally breaking the law

Huh? In a legal sense I'm pretty sure they're the same thing.

borski an hour ago | parent [-]

I ignore the law every day when I jaywalk. Technically, you’re right that that is also breaking the law. I wasn’t being careful with my words.

How and why matters, though.

tjwebbnorfolk 20 minutes ago | parent [-]

There is a difference between "fake it till you make it" and "blatant widespread fraud", but the line is blurrier than many startups would like to admit.

KennyBlanken 3 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> At its core, this article argues that Delve fakes compliance while creating the appearance of compliance without the underlying substance.

Anderson Consulting er I mean "Accenture": "Hey, that's our job!"

PWC: "Yeah! Fuck off!"

KPMG: "Damn straight!"

Ernst & Young: "What they said."

Deloitte & Touche: "Ditto."

( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accounting_scandals#List_of_th... )

sky2224 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can you provide examples of YC startups that knowingly broke laws and just dealt with those issues later? I'm not very aware.

bix6 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

Airbnb, DoorDash

antonvs 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

Uber

gmerc 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The deal is to have plausible deniability and not get caught

colechristensen an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's a sliding scale between fake it `till you make it and fraud.

tikhonj an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah, fraud is what happens when you don't make it.

Pxtl 12 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

They broke laws that programmers care about.

Like, it's a company that sells AI-slop powered regulatory compliance. How many laws do you think the "fake it ill you make it and you'll never make it" AI will break? But "regulatory compliance" is laws that startups hate, so breaking them is good.

Copyright and the copyleft licenses built upon it are the laws that support the software industry instead of just making sure innocent people aren't hurt by all this innovating and disrupting.

jacquesm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"By combining the evidence I collected together with what the sim.ai team provided, I will show that Delve has stolen an open-source company’s tech by violating their license and then making a lot of money with it."

->

You mean like OpenAI, Anthropic and all these other 'unicorns'?

I'm happy we're all clear on how bad Delve is but in essence what they were doing is exactly the same as what these AI companies do.

Tyrubias an hour ago | parent [-]

While I despise the sham commercial LLMs have made out of intellectual property, I think Delve is one step worse than that. The technology behind LLMs is innovative, even if the data used to train them have ethically and legally dubious origins. Delve doesn’t even have the ability to claim anything they’ve done as original, unless you count fraud as a service.

jacquesm an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The only thing that makes delve worse in my book is that they're selling compliance, they have zero excuses. But the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic even if they don't sell compliance do whitewash bulk copyright violations and they have valuations far in excess of Delve. Too big to fail I guess.

chromacity 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Delve doesn’t even have the ability to claim anything they’ve done as original, unless you count fraud as a service.

I'd wager there's some prior art...

throwaway81523 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Fraud as a service! The next big thing!!!

cjbgkagh 5 minutes ago | parent [-]

Presidential pardon insurance, like audit insurance but for breaking laws instead of filing taxes.

philip1209 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Can they keep their CISO out of jail?

carabiner an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Bye-bye tweet from founder: https://x.com/kocalars/status/2040262537166618887

Notably YC hasn't wished them a farewell.

GaryBluto an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> striving to make the world a better place.

Why do all start-ups say this? I don't think there are many companies publicly saying "We're going to go 'scorched earth' on everybody."

shepherdjerred a few seconds ago | parent | next [-]

Oracle, right?

bombcar an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Because if they had the money to be honest about it they'd not be a start-up!

emerald_rat903 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So they decide to drop this from their COO while their CEO has been doing all the talking on a friday night? Looks like YC told them they had to announce this and this was their least-viewable option.

mikert89 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

funny thing about this tweet is the founder still couldnt stop herself from name dropping MIT

claaams 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Much like their soc audits, her time at MIT was also incomplete. Still doesn’t stop them from cosplaying as a grad though!

carabiner an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Look at this series of tweets from her

> One interesting observation I’ve noticed is a lot of top founders did oddly strong at math from a young age.

https://x.com/kocalars/status/2027076198002553159

barf emoji

philip1209 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

At least they put a ladder up that tree

blast 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

friday news dump tho

rvz an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is no saving Delve after this.

The only next product launch is an investigation.

baggy_trough an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

can't believe I almost spent 10 grand on this company a week before they blew up.

everfrustrated 18 minutes ago | parent [-]

The two founders being early 20's with no background in compliance wasn't a red-flag?

mememememememo 6 minutes ago | parent [-]

Plus the 30u30 is now a signal.