"By combining the evidence I collected together with what the sim.ai team provided, I will show that Delve has stolen an open-source company’s tech by violating their license and then making a lot of money with it."

You mean like OpenAI, Anthropic and all these other 'unicorns'?

I'm happy we're all clear on how bad Delve is but in essence what they were doing is exactly the same as what these AI companies do.

▲

Tyrubias 2 hours ago | parent [-]

While I despise the sham commercial LLMs have made out of intellectual property, I think Delve is one step worse than that. The technology behind LLMs is innovative, even if the data used to train them have ethically and legally dubious origins. Delve doesn’t even have the ability to claim anything they’ve done as original, unless you count fraud as a service.

▲

jacquesm 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The only thing that makes delve worse in my book is that they're selling compliance, they have zero excuses. But the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic even if they don't sell compliance do whitewash bulk copyright violations and they have valuations far in excess of Delve. Too big to fail I guess.

▲

chromacity 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Delve doesn’t even have the ability to claim anything they’ve done as original, unless you count fraud as a service.

I'd wager there's some prior art...

▲

throwaway81523 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Fraud as a service! The next big thing!!!

	▲	cjbgkagh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Presidential pardon insurance, like audit insurance but for breaking laws instead of filing taxes.