| ▲ | eigenrick 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||
So we're re-creating the Apollo 8 Mission 60 years later. 60 years after swinging around the moon, we are going to attempt the feat again. I'm having a hard time getting excited... Especially when some say it may not survive reentry because of politics (https://idlewords.com/2026/03/artemis_ii_is_not_safe_to_fly....) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cagey 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> So we're re-creating the Apollo 8 Mission 60 years later. Not even: Apollo 8[0] went into orbit around the moon (orbited 10 times), then left lunar orbit to return to Earth. This required mission-critical rocket burns both to enter (LOI) and exit (TEI) lunar orbit. Artemis II[1] is merely doing a "fly-by"; it'll never enter lunar orbit, a much less challenging/risky mission. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0xf00ff00f 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
This is the first time humans go beyond LEO in my lifetime, so personally I'm pretty excited. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | outworlder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Sure, you may look at it from that perspective. Or, you could look into it as restoring a capability that we used to have, and potentially enable further, more interesting missions. I am not _too excited_ about the SLS itself as it looks like a political compromise, just as the shuttle was. But better late than never. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | autoexec 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I thought I'd heard they'd already made changes to the heat shield after the last failure. Hopefully whatever they learn from this trip will be useful for their next one. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Gagarin1917 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
That’s not it. Most people don’t even know what Apollo 8 was. The average person thinks NASA’s only mission of note was Apollo 11, they don’t even realize there were 5 other landings. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throw0101c 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> 60 years after swinging around the moon, we are going to attempt the feat again. I'm having a hard time getting excited... There was a comedian that had the observation a few years back that we've lost our saw of awe and wonder: he was on a plane when Internet was just being introduced, and it was announced on the flight, but after a little bit it stopped working and they announced 'technical difficulties' and it wouldn't be available. The guy next to him was like "this is bullshit": how quickly the world owed this guy something that he knew existed only a few minutes before. As he goes on: often whenever people complain about their flights, it was like a 1940s German cattle car: X happened, then Y happened. And his response is: And then what happened? Did you fly in the air? Did you sit on a chair in the sky? Like a bird, like humans have been imaging since the tail of Icarus (and before)? Hedonic adaptation is real (which is "fine" as far as it goes, as striving for better isn't a bad thing): * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill But given you're invoking history, it's easy how it is to forget the woe that humans lived in just a few decades before Apollo 8, and the incredible strides that happened (and that many people on the planet, even now, have yet to fully experience): * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_American_... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cyanydeez 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Given how incurious 99% of the elected american government is, the amount of enthusiasm has a very low ceiling. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | whackernews 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
[flagged] | ||||||||||||||