|
| ▲ | progbits 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Indeed. I would love for it to be true, but aside from opencascade^1 all the professional kernels are proprietary and not in the training set, so LLMs can't just regurgitate them. ^1: Which I really appreciate, but let's be real, it is far behind eg. parasolid. |
|
| ▲ | faangguyindia 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just wait for sometime, there will be one. There are many geniuses on HN for tacking up challenge |
| |
| ▲ | WillAdams 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Vibe coding only seems to work, insofar as it does when the training data includes multiple exemplars of solutions to a given problem. As noted elsethread, there's only one geometric kernel which is decently far along and opensource and it's over 1 million LOC --- I doubt it's being included in any training data, and I doubt that an LLM could regurgitate such a large project which would then compile w/o errors and then work as expected --- the number of tokens required to get such a project to an initial state is a marked hurdle as well. | |
| ▲ | fainpul 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | So you think AI can do this – why exactly is a genius needed? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | stackedinserter 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Correct me if I'm wrong, kernel is already there, and it's decent enough. What's lacking is a good user interface to it. |
| |
| ▲ | progbits 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | FreeCAD is perfectly good user interface for opencascade. The problem is that as your geometry gets more complicated you start running into the kernel limitations. | |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
