That people on this forum convinced themselves that it's a reasonable take to vibe code a useful geometric kernel is profoundly depressing.

▲

progbits 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Indeed. I would love for it to be true, but aside from opencascade^1 all the professional kernels are proprietary and not in the training set, so LLMs can't just regurgitate them.

^1: Which I really appreciate, but let's be real, it is far behind eg. parasolid.

▲

faangguyindia 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just wait for sometime, there will be one.

There are many geniuses on HN for tacking up challenge

	▲	fainpul 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So you think AI can do this – why exactly is a genius needed?

▲

stackedinserter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Correct me if I'm wrong, kernel is already there, and it's decent enough. What's lacking is a good user interface to it.

	▲	progbits 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		FreeCAD is perfectly good user interface for opencascade. The problem is that as your geometry gets more complicated you start running into the kernel limitations.
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]