Remix.run Logo
poulpy123 2 days ago

I'm always perturbed to see people talk of mass killings so casually

sph 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Number 1 reason why I want to see the United States of America and its very loud citizens get a taste of humble pie in this self-inflicted crisis of idiocy with global ramifications.

Even when discussing a war that's obviously gone out of hand with no easy resolution in right, there's still this air, this attitude from American commenters that somehow the might and brilliance of the US military will prevail in the end and they can restore their position as leaders of the free world. Meanwhile the rest of the world has waited 50 years for this day.

Let me have a little schadenfreude with my €2.20+ litre of petrol.

munificent a day ago | parent | next [-]

> I want to see the United States of America and its very loud citizens get a taste of humble pie in this self-inflicted crisis of idiocy with global ramifications.

I sympathize with the sentiment even though I am American. The problem with this is that Americans are not a uniform cohort.

The people who deserve to eat humble pie in this scenario are neck deep in propaganda and their own inflated egos and will never learn any rational lesson from this despite how catastrophically it might go. The Americans who are paying attention and will understand the harm of this operation already know it's a fiasco and wish the country was doing anything but what it is doing.

randomNumber7 a day ago | parent [-]

> The people who deserve to eat humble pie in this scenario are neck deep in propaganda and their own inflated egos and will never learn any rational lesson from this

They will turn on someone or something they can blame.

munificent 7 hours ago | parent [-]

100%. Scapegoating is a key pillar in the authoritarian playbook.

recursivedoubts 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

a strong majority of the united states citizens are against the war, despite a full court propaganda press against the right and a no-kings distraction op against the left

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2026/03/25/americans-br...

don't confuse american citizens with the bought-and-paid talking & tweeting heads we are forced to live with

pjc50 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

"No Kings" isn't a distraction, it's very tangible popular opposition, and they're certainly not in favor of the war?

recursivedoubts 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

It muddies the waters by focusing on divisive issues like immigration enforcement and de-emphasizing the war, preventing what could be a unified left-and-right antiwar movement.

Plain anti-war protests could draw significant support across the political spectrum, so divisive issues are inserted as wedges. Same thing that happened in the 60's, when the anti-war movement went from a coat-and-tie affair to a laurel canyon one.

zzgo 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

If you think the No Kings movement is preventing a unified front against the war, you haven't been paying attention to the political discourse in the US since the rise of the Tea Party 15+ years ago.

recursivedoubts 2 days ago | parent [-]

man

DFHippie a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So Indivisible, which planned the protest, knew the US was going to attack Iran months in advance and plotted this protest to distract from it? What strategic masterminds! What opsec! The left always seemed so fractious and disorganized, but they were just wily, biding their time. But, why?

Seriously, I'm sure you're smart enough to know this is absurd. Just sit down and think about it a bit.

testaccount28 17 hours ago | parent [-]

would you expect dr evil to give a good "mwahahaha" and a bow?

ludicrousdispla 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

From the Pew Research poll you linked above:

> Among those who consider themselves Republicans, 79% say they approve of how Trump is handling the conflict.

71% of Republicans say the decision to use military force in Iran was correct.

88% of Democrats say the U.S. made the wrong decision to use military force in Iran.

intended 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There will be no public rapprochement between the right and the left pretty much anywhere in the world.

They are fed by entirely different media machines.

If you like, its a coordination problem where the various groups no longer have the commons of a shared reality to coordinate through.

platevoltage a day ago | parent [-]

It's not just the "media machines". These two sides have completely different moral values.

randomNumber7 a day ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

williamoforange a day ago | parent [-]

Caring about others and wanting a fair, even handed and democratic government is not self-righteous you muppet. All you are doing is trying to justify your shitty ideals.

randomNumber7 a day ago | parent | next [-]

Your reply proves me right.

stackbutterflow a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You'll notice it's about how it makes the poster feel.

Complaints against the right are usually about their actions, the terrible consequences and how they hurt people.

Complaints against the left are often how it makes the complainer feel, it's a mental struggle to not admit they like the result of right wing policies and not being able to embrace a left wing position despite knowing on some level that they should.

logicchains a day ago | parent | prev [-]

>Caring about others and wanting a fair, even handed and democratic government is not self-righteous you muppet

It's self-righteous to say they care about other people but want to help those people with other people's money, not their own. Statistically speaking leftists give far less to charity.

platevoltage 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Statistically speaking, Right wingers have all of the money, even if they started off as liberals. This is silly Capitalist propaganda.

platevoltage a day ago | parent | prev [-]

There is no anti-war movement on the right. The only time there is, is when a Right-winger is trying to win an election. Once said right winger inevitably starts a war, the pom poms come out.

recursivedoubts a day ago | parent | next [-]

Tucker Carlson is perhaps the most popular commentator on the right and has a significant following and he is adamantly anti-war.

There is a legitimate cross-ideology opportunity here that the war party (which spans both american political parties) is desperate to keep from materializing.

LAC-Tech a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think you are ignorant about the nuances of the US right. It is not a monolithic block anymore than the US left is.

Prominent right-wing figures who are against this war:

- Tucker Carlson

- Thomas Massie

- Candace Owens

- Marjorie Taylor Greene

- Rand Paul

- Steve Bannon

- Nick Fuentes

- Matt Gaetz

Honourable mentions:

- Joe Rogan (I know many people on HN would consider him right wing)

- Charlie Kirk (in the months leading up to his death he said it would be a "catastrophic mistake")

Trump's approval rating has dropped -16.7 points: this represents many of his core supporters bleeding away.

randomNumber7 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

If everyone just noticed that they have to vote left the world would be a paradise /S

gzread a day ago | parent [-]

You can't vote left in the US, there are no left parties and no left politicians.

colordrops a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They don't even mention the country Iran or the war by name, because it's a DNC op and the DNC also supports war in Iran. They don't mention Israel or Gaza, because the main organizers and funders are Zionist. They have no concrete demands. It's a distraction, a release valve, controlled opposition.

freefrog1234aa a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Imagine being king of a gulf monarchy watching the "no kings" protests. Probably censored.

culi a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The No Kings protests I saw were full of anti-war signs. I kinda assumed the whole protest was an anti-war protest primarily so I'm surprised to hear this take

andrewflnr 21 hours ago | parent [-]

It's an anti-Trump protest, so named because of how badly Trump wishes he was a king. The slogan (and organization, maybe?) dates back to at least the start of his current term.

culi 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes. I don't think that contradicts anything I said. It's the third major round in a series of protests and I believe this one was planned after Trump started a war against Iran. I don't think it's a stretch to say that opposition to war was a primary motivating factor for many that attended. I certainly would find that a reasonable conclusion from the signs I saw

andrewflnr 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Technically not contradictory, but it's pretty weird to call it an anti-war protest with no further qualification, when the overall emphasis, long term anyway, is clearly anti-Trump. Emphasis matters.

protocolture a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Will the citizens of said country do anything to prevent their government from doing this?

If no, then why does their disposition matter?

jeroenhd a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Every time someone criticises the USA for its atrocities and its ridiculous foreign policies I see this argument, that supposedly most people are supposedly against whatever bad thing is happening right now.

Yet, Americans elected Trump, twice even, and gave his party control over the other branches of government at the same time.

We'll see at the midterms how much the American populace really disagrees with what the government is doing.

voganmother42 6 hours ago | parent [-]

If there is a midterm election

twodave a day ago | parent | prev [-]

This. Much of the most prevalent messaging on both the extreme left and the extreme right tends to be from other countries posing as Americans. It’s also difficult to even form opinions lately as the amount of lying by all outlets is nearly impossible to sift through. All we really know is that right, left, black, white, gay or straight, nobody is actually on our side anymore.

jacquesm a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You'd think after 9/11 that the US would approach all of this with more forethought but the opposite seems to be the case.

sam-cop-vimes 18 hours ago | parent [-]

When I was a child, I was part of a team playing a game against a team which was stronger than us. Each player from one team had to take turns taking the attack to the opponent's team. Every player in our team put themselves forward thinking they can do better, only to be slapped down.

The current administration's approach is something similar. They think that because they have managed to take over American politics and do as they please in the US, they think they can do anything they want outside the US as well. Previous administrations had more awareness of their limitations - but I guess we are in the FA of the FAFO phase.

s5300 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

boc a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

stein1946 a day ago | parent | next [-]

> America wages a war of revenge

A war of what? Do you really believe that states wage war because of "revenge"?

> Perhaps America isn't as dumb as you think

No, they are dumber.

If this presidency was in Europe - or any other 1st world country - it would have been obliterated immediately and the party wiped out in the next elections.

> because of their strategic preparation.

lol to that.

temp8830 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Some folks had to be in line for gas 50 years ago, and the revenge for that is killing children? I guess "dumb" doesn't describe this. "Insane" is a better fit.

fundatus 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, the US is still dependent on foreign heavy oil for their refineries as it mostly produces shale oil (for export). So it very much isn't independent even though it looks like it when you see the numbers.

voganmother42 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Right, like when they didn't refill the oil reserves, brilliant 4d chess.

peterbecich a day ago | parent [-]

That is partially due to damage from the previous reserve drawdown.

a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
megous a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Great, you can now help genocide defenseless children, and attack countries to cause massive disruptions to the rest of the world, without much worry. Sure great strategy to get HATED, as you should be.

hermannj314 a day ago | parent | prev [-]

One freedom denied to Americans is that we can not provide comfort to our enemies - this is punishable by death according our constitution, so we tend to err on unwavering support for our military always.

Many Americans may be absolutely against this horrible, barbaric, idiotic action in the Middle East, but they might wisely not want to talk about it.

So let me say "Thank you to all American troops for your service, God bless America. Our military is the only reason we have peace and freedom." - this is my official public opinion as an American and I would never have at least two witnesses catch me saying anything different.

JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> perturbed to see people talk of mass killings so casually

I'm almost perturbed to not see it discussed at all. What are the casualty estimates of blasting open the Strait?

Caius-Cosades 2 days ago | parent [-]

I'm just going to throw some napkin pointers and rough guesstimate-arithmetics here.

-At the very minimum you would have to search and secure 130 000 square kilometers in a mountainous region, in a hostile country where you have no popular support, and where most of the male population has had somewhere around two years of military training. To be sure that Iranians couldn't lob anti-ship missiles into the strait, you'd probably need to double or triple that area. -And that's because of anti-ship missiles, with distances ranging from few hundred kilometers to thousand or more. And only one missile needs to get through to cause a mass casualty event onboard of a warship involving hundreds of people.

So, assuming that troops get to the shore, then there's the slight peculiarity of modern warfighting. Drones. Cheap and plentiful, with FPV drones having the range varying from 30 to 60+km, you can be assured that visitors stay on shore or island(s) will be filled with plenty of activities such as listening to never ending buzzing of drones or trying to find cover from those drones. As good as US electronic warfare efforts might be, wire-guided FPV drones don't really care. So unless the US incursion is going to be anything but a short 30 minute visit to a largely meaningless Tump island we're probably going to be looking at hundreds of casualties if we are extremely lucky. If they really want to open and "secure" the Strait, I think we're going to be looking at Russo-Ukrainian war-tier butcher's bill.

And since that would be perfectly fine for Israel, I think that's exactly what we'll be getting. I hope I'm wrong though.

lpapez 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The US public discourse is so dehumanized today that anyone who is not "with them" is literally not a human anymore. Even within the country itself "the leftards" are considered an obstacle which can be removed if only enough force is applied.

Sending armed agents at protesters is seen as being the same thing as sending pest control to clear out beaver dams on the creek. Nobody cares what the beavers think, they are not human, they do not have feelings. They are simply a menace to be dealth with.

pydry 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

The supporters of imperialism all about nonviolent protest and democratic principles if it seems feasible it could bring about US foreign policy goals: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47111067

Or, if an anonymous and uncorroborated source claims tens of thousands of said protestors were allegedly massacred.

If it doesn't, and the strategy now involves blowing up desalinization plants ( https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-threat-desalination-pl... ) and invoking a humanitarian crisis on the level of a nuclear catastrophe, well... then they're a bit less concerned about human rights.

a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
smitty1e 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

JumpCrisscross 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> The conservatives, when they protest (Tea Parties) leave public spaces in fine shape

We're just skipping Charlottesville and the Capitol? We have idiots on both of our fringes. But only one of them is in power right now.

chneu 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Jan 6th.

Even the example you gave is incorrect. Lol. It's so obvious when conservatives cherry pick information to placate their views.

comrade1234 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The conservatives, when they protest (Tea Parties) leave public spaces in fine shape.

As long as you ignore the feces smeared on the walls and the injured police.

no_shadowban_5 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

no_shadowban_5 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

orwin 2 days ago | parent [-]

It took 8 years the last time.

roenxi 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There aren't a lot of alternatives - the amount of mass killing going on right now is unusually high. People can't spend all day frothing with moral outrage at the horror of it all. If something is routine there isn't much of an alternative than to discuss it as routine.

This article is actually unusually good, I wouldn't be surprised if the site was generally anti-war. It isn't unusual for the level of analysis to be "we're the in-group, we're morally right, they're the out-group, we can't imagine they're competent, lets kill them it'll be easy". The moment people start doing serious analysis they become well-armed pacifists. As a case study; this war is part of a trend of the US hurting itself in aid of ... nothing useful for the US. The only silver lining is I don't see the Trump presidency surviving this and that might be a lesson to the next guy about trying to start fights.

div 2 days ago | parent [-]

It’s really quite amazing how the US went in without seemingly an iota of planning beyond “kill ayatollah for regime change”, but at this rate we will see US regime change before Iranian.

ZeroGravitas 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Enough planning for the Secretary of War to buy defense stocks and the son of the president to own a drone manufacturing company.

Just not planning for anything that might help "make America great again".

ryandrake 2 days ago | parent [-]

It's really this simple. People seem so confused as to why this administration is doing this and why this administration is doing that, but it's clearly about personal enrichment of leaders. It's not some complex 5D chess game. If you want to know why Trump did this or why Hegseth did that or why Bondi did thus, just look at who placed bets, owns stock, owns companies, and/or will be personally enriched by the decision. That's all there is to it.

gzread a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Trump asks the Oracle at Delphi what will occur if he invades Iran.

"This war will surely bring about regime change," says the Oracle.

"Good," thinks Trump as he heads into the defense meeting.

xtiansimon 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> “…getting blown to smithereens…”

Looney Tunes language like this projects an aura of un-reality further in the article, which I like even less.

andrepd 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"Responsible Statecraft" they call themselves.

no_shadowban_5 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Didn't you read the URL?

It's not mass killing, it's statecraft.

It's not casual, it's responsible.

ghywertelling 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

James Cameron in Avatar: Fire and Ash makes fun of these Big Picture guys (so called ThinkTank people) towards the end.

jacquesm a day ago | parent [-]

That's a movie. This is about reality.

ghywertelling 19 hours ago | parent [-]

ThinkTank guys have been around since centuries. This movie was released in Dec 2025. Do you think there could be a causal link? Art imitates life.

tdeck a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It's not this, it's that! And a green account no less.