OP dances around the key context that this isn’t hidpi, but rather a 3rd party hack that uses hidpi rendering to supersample their “native” 4k resolution by 2x, since the end result looks more pleasing to them than the native 4k render.

▲

whatever1 2 days ago | parent [-]

Apple does that for MacBook Airs as well since their monitor resolution is not ideal for integer scaling.

▲

brigade 2 days ago | parent [-]

Apple never supersamples by 2x. Default MacBook Air scaling was around 1.1x iirc.

▲

raihansaputra 2 days ago | parent [-]

It’s actually around 1.5x for the default resolution out of the box and 1.3x for “more space” setting on m1/m2 MacBook Air. 1.1x supersampling on Macs makes it worse because down sampling to pixel alignment becomes a hot mess.

▲

brigade 2 days ago | parent [-]

Fine, you made me look it up. M1 Air defaults to 2880x1800 on a 2560x1600 display, which is a 1.125x scaling. Nowhere near the 1.5x you claim.

▲

whatever1 2 days ago | parent [-]

2560 x 1664 is the resolution of the latest M5 Air. The default UI is 1470 × 956. "More space" is 1710 × 1112.

When you set it to "more space" it becomes noticeably slower, but not blurry.

	▲	sgerenser a day ago \| parent [-]
		Those numbers of 1470x956 are “points” or “looks like” values, not the size of the frame buffer. The frame buffer for “looks like 1470x956” is exactly 2x that, or 2940x1912. On a 2560x1664 display, that’s a 1.148x scale factor. Again, nowhere near 2x, even on the “more space” setting.