In one study, GPT-4.5 was judged to be human 73% of the time, which means that the actual human was judged to be human only 27% of the time. More human than human, as Tyrell would say.

Edit: folks, the standard Turing test involves a computer and a human, and then a judge communicating with both and giving a verdict about which one is the human. The percentages for the two entities being judged will add up to exactly 100%. That's how this test was conducted. Please don't assume I'm a moron.

▲

dwpdwpdwpdwpdwp an hour ago | parent | next [-]

The implication would be that GPT-4.5 was not judged to be human 27% of the time. You can't determine how often humans were judged correctly as humans from that data point.

	▲	jmalicki 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The structure of the test was that there was one human and one AI conversation partner, and the rater had to choose which one was which. Given that structure, you can judge from that data point.

▲

Melatonic an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Those stats dont necessarily line up that way. Do you have a link?

	▲	jmalicki 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Given the way the test was structured it does line up. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23674