| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> isn’t there an implicit IRR that a household would maintain and usually a 20 year payoff would be maybe not the first use of investment dollars? Yes. Also, the risk for industry is going all in right before a new technology comes out. At that point, you either write off your original investment and deploy the new kit. Or you accept a structural energy-cost disadvantage. I am massively pro renewables. But you have to ignore a lot to pretend it's without risk. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | scoofy 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The system already pays for itself. The only thing you lose if a new technology comes out is opportunity cost. You also likely don’t want to be an early adopter of the newest tech anyway if this is a concern for you. This doesn’t really make sense to me as an objection, so maybe I misunderstood. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||