> It appears that...

Well, maybe look closer before sharing premature conclusions and speculation as if they're news?

Current title is incorrect and ragebait. Lunduke's already known for stirring shit and making a murder out of the tinyest of feathers. The most disappointing thing in this story besides the flaming of maintainers is people still taking L's rants seriously. He's DoSing community attention and you're falling for it.

▲

fgonzag 5 hours ago | parent [-]

From an r/ArchLinux moderator responding to a censored user:

"I got a DM from much higher up the chain asking me to remove it. Whilst I technically don't answer to them, I do respect their wishes. They don't like someone they consider as part of the core dev teams being called out like that. What you did broke the Arch Linux CoC."

Wait so is this part not true?

	▲	pamcake 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Your quote is referencing action taken with regards to one specific case, because of CoC violation (nothing there about choice of topic). The title is worded as if there is a general stance with regards to position on topic. The latter does not follow from the former. Raising questions and voicing considerations is one thing while brigading and flaming is another. This outrage is manufactured.