Remix.run Logo
cdrnsf a day ago

[flagged]

1over137 a day ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

cdrnsf a day ago | parent [-]

Indeed, particularly given that ICE agents are going to be deployed to airports. Their penchant for killing civilians and otherwise violating civil rights only to lie about their actions hardly seems like a good fit for airport security duties they haven’t been trained to perform.

encrypted_bird a day ago | parent | next [-]

> duties they haven't been trained to perform

Which implies they've been trained?

cdrnsf a day ago | parent [-]

Fair, they haven’t. I wonder how long it will take them to use tear gas when the line at a Starbucks kiosk gets a little too long.

encrypted_bird a day ago | parent [-]

I fear the day when that happens.

nandomrumber a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

throwawaytea a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

Arubis a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

pier25 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I travelled to the US some weeks ago and was anxious but everything turned out ok. I'm happy I don't have to go back any time soon.

JPKab a day ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

pier25 a day ago | parent | next [-]

I won't share personal details but you couldn't be more wrong.

a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
surgical_fire a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Or maybe he just got lucky.

Impossible to prove otherwise. No reason to try his luck.

dotancohen a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

JPKab a day ago | parent [-]

I worked in the Pentagon for 10 years, and got my beak wet with neural nets there very early, back when we were using Playstation 3s for their GPUs.

I was staunchly against the Iraq war, but even when Bush was president I didn't let it compromise my patriotism.

The amount of people on here who ignore the fact that Iran was the primary enabler of Hamas' attack on 10/7/23, and therefore sowed the seeds of the destruction of Gaza, is insane. Basically, if Trump does a thing, they are against it, independent of the thing. There is no principle, just reactionary hatred. If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it. I am 100% positive on that assumption.

galangalalgol a day ago | parent | next [-]

It seems like about 20% of people judge the actions of a us administration independent of their partisan positions. I am recently joined and cannot claim it is from any virtue on my part. A backlash against an attempted autocratic takeover is a common starting point for successful ones by an opposing party. Leftist autocratic coups are only slightly rarer than rightist ones. We are in the middle of an attempted rightist one, but that doesn't mean we are safe if we remove them.

nozzlegear a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it. I am 100% positive on that assumption.

I think you're wrong here. As a Biden stan who's gone to the mat debating Biden's policies here on HN many times in the past, he lost pretty much all of the remaining good will he had by defending and supporting Israel for so long after it became clear what they were doing in Gaza. Biden wouldn't be getting a free pass in the Middle East if it were helping Israel's goals (ignoring the fact that Biden is much more of a dove than Trump).

mcphage a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Basically, if Trump does a thing, they are against it, independent of the thing.

Because on top of doing terrible things, the non-terrible things he does, he does incredibly badly.

> There is no principle, just reactionary hatred.

No, we’re all good little Bayesians around here.

> If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it.

You’re really missing what’s going on here. The reason that people liked Biden is that he would not have launched this war.

what a day ago | parent [-]

> The reason that people liked Biden is that he would not have launched this war.

No, they liked him because he wasn’t Trump. And then they liked Trump more after having him.

nozzlegear 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I liked Biden because he's a genuinely good statesman, with decades of experience building bipartisan relationships (some admittedly bad, most good) both domestically and internationally. I didn't vote against Trump in 2020, I voted for Biden. And you can bet your sweet bippy that I'd do it again.

mcphage 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> And then they liked Trump more after having him.

And it only cost them their country. Not bad!

anon7000 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I highly disagree, one clear thing conservatives and liberals largely agree on is no more wars in the Middle East. It’s astonishing to me that Trump supporters who voted for an isolationist policy are happy with him intervening in the Middle East (not to mention South America) again.

Yes, I am “reactively” hating our president for starting wars without congressional approval and with very handwavy explanations. Besides, he has a track record for saying whatever the fuck he wants if he thinks people will like it, so you can’t trust the words from his mouth anyways. It’s pretty infuriating, actually.

I would be much happier if there was a clear justification and rational explanation for the president starting more wars in the Middle East. And yes, because Biden has a slightly better baseline of not telling bold-faced lies, I could see more people giving the benefit of the doubt at first. But overall, liberals did not like Biden very much. Trump, on the other hand, has a pretty hardcore base of people who don’t seem to care what he says or that he does/says the opposite of what he used to say. Pretty weird.

By the way, this opinion is not formed by reading or listening to any kind of mainstream media. It’s formed from listening to the words coming out of Trump’s mouth for the past fucking decade.

dotancohen a day ago | parent [-]

If "no more wars in the middle east" means that America can not protect herself from a nation that regularly chants Death To America, then it really means "I'd rather see America as a society fail than stand up and defend myself".

donkeybeer 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Words are violence!!!

Chanting for death to any country or religion is not violence dude. Until and actually Iran launches an attack on the USA.

Iran didn't start this war, America and Israel did, while right in the middle of a pretend negotiation with them.

I believe this is a strong sign that any time Israel or America are asking to negotiate with any country, they should prepare a full scale military action ready for the real "negotiation".

edit: Are you a dual citizen? Everyone has a right to free speech of course and to support or not support any country or cause. But if you feel so strongly about a foreign country, why don't you be honest with yourself and pick a lane. I say this to everyone, not just Israeli, but Chinese, Dutch, any other dual citizens.

dotancohen 14 hours ago | parent [-]

You are correct, words are not violence.

Arming the Huthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, and various Iraqi militias _is_ violence. When an aggressor with a history of violence says that they are coming for you next, it is prudent to believe them. Iran has been chanting Death To America and Death To Israel for decades. They have been attacking Israel and are developing technology to attack the United States. It is the United States' responsibility to ensure that the attack will not come.

Claiming that Iran is not violent is a lie. Promoting the idea that the US should wait to be attacked first is a nice way to allow Iran to arm properly and ensure US interests are sufficiently harmed.

donkeybeer 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Most importantly, Iran has always complied with audits to its nuclear program. I would much more urgently worry about the only country in the middle east that lies about having nukes, refuses to get them audited and continually starts wars with anyone and everyone, and proclaims everything under the sun as "antisemitism" and then gins up military action against supposed "antisemites" whenever it can. Hundreds of illegal nukes in the hands of such a volatile entity are grounds for immense world wide existential concern.

dotancohen 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I know who you are implying, so go ahead and mention a single war that they have started.

donkeybeer 10 hours ago | parent [-]

This very war being one?

dotancohen 8 hours ago | parent [-]

This very war that began with Iranian agents invading Israel, taking hostages, beheading people, raping women, murdering the elderly in their homes?

By what conceivable measure do you think Israel started it?

donkeybeer 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You are extremely confused. Gaza is not Iran.

dotancohen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The Gazans are armed by Iran. Hamas, the Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for Palestine Liberation, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committee, the Mujahideen Brigades, and the Islamic Republic all claim this.

donkeybeer 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

Then likewise why shouldn't dozens of countries across the world launch invasions against the USA due to the USA sponsoring countless terroristic proxies around the world. If "Iran" did oct 7th then America did 9/11, America did the contras massacres, America did Saddam Hussein chemical attacks.

donkeybeer 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Iran is violent...to its own people yes. If we want to play the proxy game then there is an unending list of proxies used by the USA all over the world to commit terrorism and war. Then by that the USA and Israel should be nuked multiple times over in proportion with the extreme level of proxy violence they commit. Since you haven't said this about the USA, then I will have no choice but to say you are lying about Iran and applying a different standard.

dotancohen 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I'll bite. Maybe I'm ignorant. Who are the US proxies committing terrorism and war?

donkeybeer 11 hours ago | parent [-]

You really don't know about Contra? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contras

It was a really massive thing.

or the Mujahiddeen.

Oh look, the list is so long there's an entire article about it, fun:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponso...

So tell me, if Israel is justified in invading Iran due to alleged proxies of Iran attacking them, would you agree that all these countries should invade the United States?

dotancohen 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Alright, help me out on this.

The Contras were anti-Marxist central American revolutionaries, yes? The Marxists overthrew the president of Nicaragua, and the US supported them, along with other nations. Israel is mentioned as being an ally, but is not mentioned in any other capacity in the article. The US was funding them with arms sold to Iran, in the hope that Iran would pressure Hezbollah to release American hostages. The Contras were found to be terrorists, that the CIA claimed were due to poor discipline, and then the Contra leader was executed.

Did I get that right? Seriously fill in the blanks for me, the Wikipedia page seems written for somebody who already knows the story. I also read part of the linked Iran-Contra page hoping it would shed some light.

donkeybeer 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah "poor discipline" /s. It was well known what the Contras were engaging in. And they are far from the only terrorist group the USA has actively sponsored. I do not think Israel is involved in this. These were examples of America funding and supporting terrorism all over the world. So if you say that Iran deserved to be invaded despite not having physically attacked anyone else but due to supposed proxy agents activities, then what should countries do to the USA who has funded much larger and worse terrorist networks?

dotancohen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Was the intention of the United States, when funding the Contras, specifically to murder people? Did the United States publicly support and legitimise murder, rape, and hostages as a political tactic?

Serious question. I don't see any evidence they did.

donkeybeer an hour ago | parent [-]

Would you be asking about intent if the end result of some "well intentioned" program was the murder of thousands of jews and terrorism all over Israel? Do you ask about intent for example when speaking of the deaths caused by well intentioned Soviet communism?

And I have given a much longer list than just the contras, where you can't even hide behind "but the origins were noble", they supported already terroristic entities.

surgical_fire a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

dotancohen a day ago | parent [-]

Yes, Hamas had been shooting rockets at Israel for almost two decades by that point.

surgical_fire a day ago | parent [-]

Probably for no reason whatsoever.

dotancohen 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Probably because the destruction of the state of Israel is clearly stated in the Hamas charter. As is massacre of Jews.

If you don't know this, then you probably shouldn't have such strong opinions on the topic.

surgical_fire 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, nothing to do with the interference on Iran from the US since the coup in 1953.

Nothing to do with how aggressive and expansionist Israel has been since its inception, not to mention how it abuses and oppresses the Palestinian population.

If you don't know this, then you probably should cut your bullshit.

Who am I kidding? Of course you know this. You just choose to ignore it.

dotancohen 13 hours ago | parent [-]

  > Nothing to do with how aggressive and expansionist Israel has been since its inception,
Israel has been expansionist only during active wars started by her neighbours. Arabs kill people, Jews counter by taking the land used to kill her citizens, and people like you decide that land is more important than life.

Then when Arabs invade Israel, and publish maps of areas they have considered, and Israel goes in to rescue her hostages, suddenly life is more valuable than land and Israel is at fault again.

  > not to mention how it abuses and oppresses the Palestinian population.
The only oppression the Palestinians have suffered at the hands of Israel are measures that Israel has taken to defend her citizens. The Palestinians themselves will tell you that they suffer far more from their own leaders and from the neighbouring Arab states, than from Israel.
nandomrumber a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

archagon a day ago | parent [-]

What is “white culture”?

I re-flagged OP.

TheSpiceIsLife a day ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

archagon a day ago | parent [-]

What do you mean by European? Because as someone with Slavic heritage, I'd rather you excluded my culture from your offensively aggregated "Western European" culture. You don't get to claim Dostoyevsky, Pushkin, and Solzhenitsyn just because the color of our skin has a similar shade. In terms of religion, the Orthodox Church only has surface-level overlap with Evangelical Protestantism. And much like the Irish, Polish, and other "less desirable" European ethnicities, we weren't even considered fully white until sometime in the 20th century.

Europe is a massive melting pot, not some single, monolithic "culture." In fact, I have much more in common with my Latino neighbors than the WASPs having conniptions over the purported decline of "white culture."

> the end of slavery

Lol, lmao. Well, it's pretty obvious what fetid corners of the web you lurk in.

tomhow 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Please don't respond to an inflammatory comment with another inflammatory comment. Flamewars about the relative merits of racial/cultural groups is the kind of bottom-of-the-barrel internet dreck that we're most trying to avoid here. Please don't perpetuate it even if it's others who've started it.

TheSpiceIsLife a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

tomhow 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You've been on HN long enough to know that this kind of discussion is not what HN is for. This comment breaks these guidelines:

Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

TheSpiceIsLife 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Would you have responded in this manner in your capacity as a HN moderator if I were expounding the virtues of Islam?

Or is it only white Christian people who are not allowed to say anything positive about the countries they live in.

tomhow 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, we uphold the guidelines no matter what “side” the commenter is on, and yes, we flag/kill comments and warn or ban users who engage in battle over race or religion, regardless of who they’re for or against. Stop poisoning HN with this kind of rhetoric and stop trying to deflect from your own disrespect of this site and its guidelines. The whole reason HN is something anyone thinks is worth defending is that we have guidelines and we uphold them consistently, regardless of topic or side. If you want to participate here, we need you, like everyone, to make the effort to raise the standards rather than drag them down.

defrost a day ago | parent | prev [-]

On the one hand, I do know where you're coming from, on the other ...

  White European culture [..] including [..] Australia, Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe before they turned to shit.

  Freedom of expression, not executing gays or hunting them for sport; the end of slavery, 
Congrats, you've named places that in my lifetime have had effective slavery (stolen generations, imposed domestic servitude) and the freedom to hunt and execute gays (illegal, but common and commonly overlooked).

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_gang_murders (in an about Sydney since the 1970s)

TheSpiceIsLife 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I’m from Adelaide, so I’m well aware of the gay bashing and “suicides” that happened in Australia.

But as you put it: had

We’re not still doing those things, are we? And if they do happen we’re going we’re not turning a blind eye to them, are we?

defrost 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Up thread you were metaphorically salivating over times past:

  White European culture, and including the USA, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe before they turned to shit.
and positively proud of

   I’m white, and I’m proud of what my ancestors have accomplished.
So, it's not about what we have come to _now_, it's the bald fact that you're seemingly onboard with times past:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coniston_massacre

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinjarra_massacre

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid

etc.

JPKab 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There was absolutely no reason to flag my comment, other than the fact that you disagree with it because it penetrates your Bay Area bubble of distorted reality.

I don't know what the comment you are replying to was talking about, and I agree that "white culture" is an absurd false construct, because "white" is a false construct. I understand flagging stuff like that, but nothing in my comment warranted it. I expressed a logical opinion. The percentage of people in the United States present on legal visas getting caught up by ICE is near-zero. It's an entirely propagandistic narrative to suggest otherwise, based entirely on motivated reasoning.

And before you label me a bigot or whatever to feed your sense of moral superiority, be aware that I'm the only "white" person in my household, and I'm also, by far, the most "liberal". Outside of the Bay Area, a lot of people of color like my wife and her family absolutely despise your politics, viewing them as luxury beliefs.

My politics are basically identical to Garry Tan's, but you've lost the plot so much that you felt a need to flag my comment.

honeycrispy a day ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]