| ▲ | pydry 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
It's interesting that the people IRL I encounter who "get the most value" tend to be the devs who couldnt distinguish well written code from slop in the first place. People online with identical views to them all assure me that theyre all highly skilled though. Meanwhile I've been experimenting using AI for shopping and all of them so far are horrendous. Cant handle basic queries without tripping over themselves. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hermannj314 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If you are a 2600 chess player, a bot that plays 1800 chess is a horrendous chess player. But you can understand why all the 1700 and below chess players say it is good and it is making them better using it for eval? Don't worry, AI will replace you one day, you are just smarter than most of us so you don't see it yet. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | AStrangeMorrow 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Idk basically everyone is my org has seen some good value out of it. We have people complaining about limitations, but would still rather have that tooling than not. For me the main difference is now some people can explain what their code does. While some other only what it wants to achieve | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tyleo 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> I've been experimenting using AI for shopping This is an interesting choice for a first experiment. I wouldn't personally base AI's utility for all other things on its utility for shopping. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||