You are absolutely right. I just changed the license to ELv2.

That isn't open source either.

As far as I know the most restrictive open source license is the AGPL, with a CLA that allows for commercial dual licensing.

bilekas 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

ELv2 is not open source either.

It is not OSI® Open Source Definition™ approved, but it is open source for the common use of the term.

	▲	TimeBearingDown 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The accepted term is "source available". Restrictions on usage type are not commonly accepted as open source by any community that I'm aware of.
	▲	bilekas 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I don't say it to be pedantic about the term, but there are hard restrictions on usage of this tool in commercial environments.. So it's important people are aware and don't just assume it's an open source.

throawayonthe 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

if you want to call it open source, why not consider AGPL?

maxloh 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nice change!

I genuinely recommend putting something like AGPL if you wish to go towards Open Source route.