| ▲ | guelo 9 hours ago | |
It is not OSI® Open Source Definition™ approved, but it is open source for the common use of the term. | ||
| ▲ | TimeBearingDown 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
The accepted term is "source available". Restrictions on usage type are not commonly accepted as open source by any community that I'm aware of. | ||
| ▲ | bilekas 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I don't say it to be pedantic about the term, but there are hard restrictions on usage of this tool in commercial environments.. So it's important people are aware and don't just assume it's an open source. | ||