| ▲ | MeetingsBrowser 18 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At least I’m not alone. My company has a vibe coded leaderboard tracking AI usage. Our token usage and number of lines changed will affect our performance review this year. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jrjeksjd8d 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have started using the most token-intensive model I can find and asking for complicated tasks (rewrite this large codebase, review the resulting code, etc.) The agent will churn in a loop for a good 15-20 minutes and make the leaderboard number go up. The result is verbose and useless but it satisfies the metrics from leadership. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | georgemcbay 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Our token usage and number of lines changed will affect our performance review this year. The AI-era equivalent of that old Dilbert strip about rewarding developers directly for fixing bugs ("I'm gonna write me a new mini-van this afternoon!") just substitute intentional bug creation with setting up a simple agent loop to burn tokens on random unnecessary refactoring. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dgellow 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Could you both name and shame? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||