| ▲ | twothreeone 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> To get the remaining 15%, which they are contractually obligated to acquire, they must purchase from the founder. As they are in violation of their contract if they fail to acquire the remaining 15%, the founder now has complete control to dictate any price they want. I can't imagine "any price they want" is quite right here. At the very least, shouldn't we expect underwriters and other stakeholders (in this case Nasdaq, Inc.) to negotiate option-contracts as part of the IPO deal to cover their future obligations? Yes, it might be a "worse" deal than those initial 5% - though we don't even know that - but then institutional investors time horizons are typically much longer than 6 months. Unless you think SpaceX goes straight down to 0, it seems like a risky but calculated, long-term investment. I agree they could be more transparent about it, but maybe they will send out a notice in the prospectus update? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | riffraff 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index funds have a variety of ways to replicate the index beyond physical replication, including options, buying "similar things", sampling etc.. So yeah, they don't really need to stick to 100% of the presented issue. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||