Remix.run Logo
autoexec 2 hours ago

How is this not fraud, or at least false advertising? If I'm paying money to chat with a specific sex worker how is it even legal to let some random dude in a third world country pretend to be the person I'm supposed to be talking to? I've never personally engaged in these types of systems, but I don't think there's a problem with them as long as they are run honestly. It sounds like Onlyfans is exploiting workers and their own customers.

mingus88 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is fraud. However, one thing has become crystal clear lately is that laws are only as good as we have systems in place that are willing and able to enforce them.

And further, scamming people in the context of sex has always been easy because of the shame in admitting you fell for it.

Imagine filing a report that you spent thousands of dollars chatting with some random person, having the chat logs submitted as evidence, etc. it’s similar to why all types of sexual assault are rarely reported

ahnick an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> laws are only as good as we have systems in place that are willing and ABLE to enforce them.

The 'able' part is the critical insight. Laws are too often passed that really have no ability to be enforced, but end up adding bureaucratic processes that law abiding companies have to follow. This also implies that governments need to actively clean up existing laws, which almost never happens unless there is enough support to pass a new law to actively supplant the old one.

ghurtado 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> because of the shame in admitting you fell for it.

I would argue that the reason has more to do with our utter inability to create common sense laws regarding anything "sex".

jzb 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Which goes back to the shame thing, really. Few people are willing to stand up and advocate for common sense laws because they don’t want to be associated with anything regarding sex. Politicians, whom are not generally noted for being averse to hiring sex workers, sure as hell don’t want to be advocating for them for fear of losing elections.

aleph_minus_one an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> Politicians [...] don’t want to be advocating for them for fear of losing elections.

This assumes that the politician plans and has a chance to become re-elected. If this is not the case, the arguments for not advocating for such laws become much less important for the respective politician.

monocasa an hour ago | parent [-]

A politician can rarely enact laws alone, and the above issues typically apply to enough politicians at a time to make having a quorum difficult.

galangalalgol 14 minutes ago | parent [-]

Is there anywhere with one term limits for law makers with no staggered terms? If every member of a parliament is yoloing it, I'm not aure if things would be better or worse.

actionfromafar an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Don't you think it also comes down to "exploitation" and not shame alone?

matheusmoreira a minute ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is fraud but nobody cares anymore. Laws only matter if you're defrauding rich corporations with pockets deep enough to actually pay lawyers to sue you over it.

shrubble 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This was done by “mail order bride” companies like those in Russia and Ukraine, that charge per message or letter sent back and forth, using their platform that does not allow for contact information to be shared; you are not talking to Anastasia but “Hairy Boris”!

Later scams evolved to use prerecorded video clips etc. Which I assume is next for OF also.

SoftTalker an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's no more fraud than any other "fan club" where you got letters and personal autographs and such from the celebrity but didn't realize it was all done by a hired staff of employees. It's been a thing for decades.

sequoia 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Someone paid to have a fantasy of sex, and they got that fantasy. If they don't like it, they don't do it again, and this is true whether it's "the model" or someone else. If they do like it, what's the issue?

This is like saying you paid for a celebrity plumber & a regular plumber did the work, but you're upset because you wanted the celebrity. "The job" got done one way or another. They're selling digital handjobs here, there's no need to be precious about it.

orthoxerox 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

On the one hand, yes, on the other hand, personal touch doesn't scale. Webcam models maintain a personal touch by broadcasting their interactions with those who tip, but OF models can't do that. They have two options when their customer base grows too large:

Option one is to use these chatters.

Option two is to chat only with those who pay extra or with no one at all.

superb_dev 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I can’t believe that someone paying for this actually expects to chat with the model. Just think of the logistics, it would be impossible

roysting a minute ago | parent [-]

Not just that, but I find it interesting that someone "pursuing" a person that is willing to sell themselves and their orifices in several ways, is at the same time surprised that such a person is not ethnical and moral.

I guess it's the same mental mechanism that allows gamblers to go to gamble in the belief that they are going to win... over an institution who's very existence is solely committed to making the gambler lose.

jacquesm 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You sound upset.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_...

V__ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is probably some lingo somewhere clarifying that you pay for the "experience" of her and not for her in particular.

bawolff 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder to what extent the clients care. Either way its still paying for a fantasy.

9rx a minute ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just wait until you find out that a MrBeast burger is not made by, or of!, the guy who plays MrBeast on TV either.

iugtmkbdfil834 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But then.. how is it any different from Amazon saying automated stores while a human is watching cameras or waymo having humans operate in some circumstances. If there are no rules, you can't expect corporates to govern themselves in a way that does not benefit them..

gruez an hour ago | parent | next [-]

>But then.. how is it any different from Amazon saying automated stores while a human is watching cameras or waymo having humans operate in some circumstances.

Did amazon/waymo actually claim they were 100% automated? Moreover is the fact that they're 100% automated a material fact to the consumer? The investors might have grounds to sue for securities fraud, but it's going to be much tougher for a consumer, when for all intents and purposes they got what they expected (ie. whatever they bought from the shop).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_fact

autoexec an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

People don't usually pay for automated stores or rides because of the automated aspect. They just want to get the items or get to their destination. I think waymo was mostly upfront that humans are working behind the scenes, but if amazon lied to investors and shareholders by claiming that their stores were automated when it was "Actually Indians" I think they could/should have been sued.

whynotmaybe 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Do we know if onlyfan is already training their own models with their user's content?

giantrobot 2 hours ago | parent [-]

How could they not be? At $2 an hour they'd be leaving money on the table by not paying a tiny fraction of that for an LLM.

thfuran an hour ago | parent [-]

I don't think it's the platform paying the workers. I think they're third parties hired by the posters. Of course, OnlyFans itself could theoretically create and offer a service to replace them, but Fraud As A Service doesn't actually seem all that reliable as a business model.

neya an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is fraud. But these parties are protected by OnlyFans themselves. Similar to how dating apps promote (and actually lot of them enforce) fake accounts with fake pictures because it boosts everything - engagement and revenue. So they always turn a blind eye.

Last week, I used a dating app where they used a fake profile tailored specifically for me, using a married woman's photo. I deleted the app. Every app in this space is scummy and the people at the top running these are just trash. That's the real reason.

enriquto 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It sounds like Onlyfans is exploiting workers and their own customers.

But this is the basic principle of capitalism. The company exploits workers (in order to obtain a net benefit from their work), and exploits customers (by selling the lowest-quality, most expensive product it can manage to). Companies that don't behave like that get out-competed by companies that do. This dynamic is the root of our economic system, as was very clearly explained by Adam Smith and Karl Marx two centuries ago (in slightly different tones of voice).

The particular case you mention is nothing special. The exact same thing happens for all the products that people buy. This is just the stable state of our (some would say "rotten", some would say "healthy") society.

nradov a minute ago | parent | next [-]

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it is the reverse.

sneak 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s not exploitation unless the participants in the deal are being coerced. You can’t make a solid case for employees being coerced to work for an exploitative employer outside of company towns or non-functioning labor markets; neither of these apply to the Philippines.

If the chatter thought the job was so bad, they can quit and get a different one. Millions of people make that choice, it is available to them. There is no requirement that they do this work; it is entirely voluntary. The people doing these jobs have determined that it is the best option for them, personally, or they wouldn’t be there.

PS: $2-4/hr is a decent wage in the Philippines.

enriquto 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> unless the participants in the deal are being coerced.

Here's the nice thing about it: they are! If they don't work (for any of the equally exploitative companies in their country) they die.

TheOtherHobbes 14 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The requirement is that they not starve, not be made homeless, and not be forced into even less appealing and/or more dangerous work.

The coercion comes from the very limited choices they have to avoid that.

fHr an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It is blatant fraud and onlyfans should be suable for this. Fuck that whole company and all their bs pr management workers doing nothing getting rich on regarded male beta simp money.

thedelanyo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's why China ban this service outright? But hey, America is a democratic and freedom land.