Remix.run Logo
enriquto 2 hours ago

> It sounds like Onlyfans is exploiting workers and their own customers.

But this is the basic principle of capitalism. The company exploits workers (in order to obtain a net benefit from their work), and exploits customers (by selling the lowest-quality, most expensive product it can manage to). Companies that don't behave like that get out-competed by companies that do. This dynamic is the root of our economic system, as was very clearly explained by Adam Smith and Karl Marx two centuries ago (in slightly different tones of voice).

The particular case you mention is nothing special. The exact same thing happens for all the products that people buy. This is just the stable state of our (some would say "rotten", some would say "healthy") society.

sneak 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s not exploitation unless the participants in the deal are being coerced. You can’t make a solid case for employees being coerced to work for an exploitative employer outside of company towns or non-functioning labor markets; neither of these apply to the Philippines.

If the chatter thought the job was so bad, they can quit and get a different one. Millions of people make that choice, it is available to them. There is no requirement that they do this work; it is entirely voluntary. The people doing these jobs have determined that it is the best option for them, personally, or they wouldn’t be there.

PS: $2-4/hr is a decent wage in the Philippines.

enriquto an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> unless the participants in the deal are being coerced.

Here's the nice thing about it: they are! If they don't work (for any of the equally exploitative companies in their country) they die.

fn-mote an hour ago | parent | next [-]

They are being coerced to participate in the capitalist system, maybe. Not to be a “chatter”.

No argument against protections, though.

nradov an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And yet lots of people don't work for companies and still manage not to die. I wonder how they do it? A mystery, I guess.

wolvesechoes 8 minutes ago | parent [-]

Yes, everyone should become a one-person company!

TheOtherHobbes an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The requirement is that they not starve, not be made homeless, and not be forced into even less appealing and/or more dangerous work.

The coercion comes from the very limited choices they have to avoid that.

nradov an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it is the reverse.

9rx 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

So what you are saying is that, under communism, women exploit women and men bear the children?

I know communism is science fiction, but I don't think that is the story it tells.