| ▲ | thisoneworks 6 hours ago |
| It'll be funny when we have Robots, "The user's facial expression looks to be consenting, I'll take that as an encouraging yes" |
|
| ▲ | theonlyjesus 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That's literally a Portal 2 joke. "Interpreting vague answer as yes" when GLaDOS sarcastically responds "What do you think?" |
| |
| ▲ | hedora 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | The simplest solution is to open the other pod bay’s door, but the user might interrupt Sanctuary Moon again with a reworded prompt if I do that. </think> I’m sorry Dave, I can’t do that. | | |
| ▲ | btschaegg 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | With that model, you're basically toast if you're "the human". It only cares about "my humans" ;) |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bluefirebrand 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is really just how the tech industry works. We have abused the concept of consent into an absolute mess My personal favorite way they do this lately is notification banners for like... Registering for news letters "Would you like to sign up for our newsletter? Yes | Maybe Later" Maybe later being the only negative answer shows a pretty strong lack of understanding about consent! |
| |
| ▲ | al_borland 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Worse yet, instead of a checkbox to opt in/out of a newsletter or marketing email when signing up or checking out, it simply opts the user in. Simply doing business with a company is consent to spam, with the excuse that the user can unsubscribe if they don’t want it. Tactics like these should be illegal, but instead they have become industry standards. | | |
| ▲ | clbrmbr 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not everyone. If your business is chill and you are REEEEALY thoughtful and respectful with newsletters you will be rewarded with open rates well in excess of 50%… |
| |
| ▲ | syncsynchalt 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Or the now-ubiquitous footer: "Store cookie? [Yes] [Ask me again]" | | |
| ▲ | bigfishrunning 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | How would it know not to ask again if it can't store a cookie? | | |
| ▲ | jkaplowitz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | At least if this "Store cookies?" question is implicitly referencing EU regulations, those regulations don't require consent for cookies which are considered essential, including a cookie to store the response to the consent question (but certainly not advertising tracking cookies). So the respectful replacement for "Ask me again" is "Essential cookies only" (or some equivalent wording to "Essential" like "Required" or "Strictly necessary"). And yes, some sites do get this right. |
|
| |
| ▲ | hedora 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | At least we haven’t gotten to Elysium levels yet, where machines arbitrarily decide to break your arm, then make you go to a government office to apologize for your transgressions to an LLM. We’re getting close with ICE for commoners, and also for the ultra wealthy, like when Dario was forced to apologize after he complained that Trump solicited bribes, then used the DoW to retaliate on non-payment. However, the scenario I describe is definitely still third term BS. |
|
|
| ▲ | cortesoft 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The more I hear about AI, the more human-like it seems. |
| |
| ▲ | hedora 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | We trained the computers to act more like humans, which means they can emulate the best of us and the worst of us. If control over them centralizes, that’s terrifying. History tells us the worst of the worst will be the ones in control. |
|
