Remix.run Logo
p0w3n3d 5 hours ago

Wow, that's the first step!

However, the most efficient method would be actually land (I know - maybe even impossible?) on it, and use propellers to change its trajectory. We don't have too much throwaway high-tech to crash it on asteroids...

XYen0n 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Impact is actually a more efficient method, as it avoids the fuel consumption required for deceleration and soft landings.

Incipient 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not sure this is actually a necessary explanation...but while propellers technically COULD function in space (not a perfect vacuum, right?)...they're basically going to be useless.

Rexxar 4 hours ago | parent [-]

He probably misuses "propeller" which is strangely restrictive to "rotative blade propulsion" in English whereas "to propel" is generic in its meaning.

fc417fc802 an hour ago | parent [-]

Be careful about how you store those inflammable propellers.