| ▲ | shevy-java 2 hours ago | |
What annoys me is the name. Early morning it took me a moment to realise that PyPy is not PyPi, so at first I thought they referred to PyPi. Really, just for the name confusion alone, one of those two should have to go. Edit: I understand the underlying issue and the PyPy developer's opinion. I don't disagree on that part; I only refer to the name similarity as a problem. | ||
| ▲ | puzzledobserver 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
Wikipedia tells me that the package index PyPI (launched in 2003) is about 4 years older than the interpreter PyPy (first released in 2007). Still, at its core, PyPy is a Python interpreter which is itself written in Python and the name PyPy fittingly describes its technical design. | ||