For a more actively maintained XNA implementation, also worth looking at Ethan Lee's FNA: https://fna-xna.github.io/

jeswin 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How well does it support Linux + NativeAOT? Thanks in advance.

azhenley 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I was trying to compare the two. At first glance, MonoGame has far more stars and recent commits. Or is it just in maintenance mode?

I believe FNA is trying to be more loyal to the original XNA while my monogame tends to introduce new features.

I've been happy with monogame when I used it in the past. I'm pretty sure Celeste was made with FNA

an hour ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

loufe 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You might be mistaken, the Monogame Github README cites Celeste as an example made with it.

Ah weird. Did a bit of searching and it looks like maybe it targeted multiple frameworks with the xna API. Including xna itself

Several games used to target Monogame for consoles but XNA for PC, and later FNA for PC.

Monogame on PC used to be somewhat buggy in my hobbyist experience.

	▲	PacificSpecific 22 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Oh interesting. I never hit any walls personally but I guess I didn't push that hard.