It's not reality. I'm really not a fan of the way that people excuse the really terrible code LLMs write by claiming that people write code just as bad. Even if that were true, it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later.

▲

lukan 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

"Even if that were true, it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later."

I admire your experience with people.

▲

darkwater an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later.

I had a coworker that more or less exactly did that. You left a comment in a ticket about something extra to be done, he answered "yes sure" and after a few days proceeded to close the ticket without doing the thing you asked. Depending on the quantity of work you had at the moment, you might not notice that until after a few months, when the missing thing would bite you back in bitter revenge.

▲

imiric 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's an easy copout.

Tool works as expected? It's superintelligence. Programming is dead.

Tool makes dumb mistake? So do humans.

	▲	brabel an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Yes and both are right. It’s a matter of which is working as expected and making fewer mistakes more often. And as someone using Claude Code heavily now, I would say we’re already at a point where AI wins.

▲

ttoinou 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No but they will despise you for bringing the problem up

▲

evolve-maz 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]