> If you ask to unify the duplication, it'll say "No problem, here's a brand new metamock abstract adapter framework that has a superset of all feature sets, plus two new metamock drivers for the older and the newer code! Let me know if you want me to write tests for the new adapters."

Nevermind the fact that it only migrated 3 out of 5 duplicated sections, and hasn’t deleted any now-dead code.

▲

Mavvie 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like my coworkers.

▲

Foobar8568 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That's the reality nobody really wants to say.

▲

Jweb_Guru 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not reality. I'm really not a fan of the way that people excuse the really terrible code LLMs write by claiming that people write code just as bad. Even if that were true, it is not true that when you ask those people to do otherwise they simply pretend to have done it and forget you asked later.

	▲	ttoinou 10 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		No but they will despise you for bringing the problem up
	▲	imiric an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		It's an easy copout. Tool works as expected? It's superintelligence. Programming is dead. Tool makes dumb mistake? So do humans.
	▲	evolve-maz 20 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]