Have you tried describing to Claude what it is? The more the detail the better the result. At some point it does become easier to just do it yourself.

▲

parvardegr 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

agreed with part that at some point it's better to just do it yourself but for sure they will get better and better

▲

marginalia_nu 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It knows what it is, it's a very well known symbol. But translating that knowledge to code is something else.

Interesting shortcoming, really shows how weak the reasoning is.

	▲	cat_plus_plus 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Try writing code from description without looking at the picture or generated graphics. Visual LLM with a suggestion to find coordinates of different features and use lines/curves to match them might do better.

▲

vdfs 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Most people just forget to tell it "make it quick" and "make no mistake"

	▲	mekael 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I’m unable to determine if you’re missing /s or not.
	▲	tartoran 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That's kind of foolish IMO. How can an open ended generic and terse request satisfy something users have in mind?