|
| ▲ | squidlogic 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If viewing replies is the goal, it looks like bsky has 2 replies and the twitter link has 45 replies. Do with that information what you will. |
| |
|
| ▲ | boca_honey 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't know if switching from a extreme partisan site to another extreme partisan site is the right solution just because of the need of login credentials. In any case, Twitter/X has been online almost 20 years. Bluesky still has to prove its staying power long term. |
| |
| ▲ | dasil003 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The justification of better UX seems reasonable regardless of politics. I'd prefer not to have to log in on any HN link, and I also can't say I want to optimize for link health as this is super topical and I will never want to look at it again after this discussion is over. | |
| ▲ | greggoB 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This reply makes zero sense to me. 1. You start off by labelling both platforms as "extreme partisan" - care to explain?
2. This charge is used to minimize the original complaint (login requirement), which is a hard blocker to view replies, i.e. additional context.
3. This all then somehow morphs into a point about platform longevity? How exactly does any of this address parent commenter's statement that "bsky is just a superior viewing experience."? | | |
| ▲ | boca_honey 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're right, I went off-topic for no good reason. I was just reacting to my personal bias against Bluesky and its stereotypical user and content. Too late to edit / delete my post but I retract it and apologize. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | davidw 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | 0x3f 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is this relevant to the question of whether we should replace the link? Seems like we're going to spend a lot of time running down the views of the UBO of every domain posted here. | | |
|
