| ▲ | boca_honey 7 hours ago | |||||||
I don't know if switching from a extreme partisan site to another extreme partisan site is the right solution just because of the need of login credentials. In any case, Twitter/X has been online almost 20 years. Bluesky still has to prove its staying power long term. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dasil003 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The justification of better UX seems reasonable regardless of politics. I'd prefer not to have to log in on any HN link, and I also can't say I want to optimize for link health as this is super topical and I will never want to look at it again after this discussion is over. | ||||||||
| ▲ | greggoB 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
This reply makes zero sense to me. 1. You start off by labelling both platforms as "extreme partisan" - care to explain? 2. This charge is used to minimize the original complaint (login requirement), which is a hard blocker to view replies, i.e. additional context. 3. This all then somehow morphs into a point about platform longevity? How exactly does any of this address parent commenter's statement that "bsky is just a superior viewing experience."? | ||||||||
| ||||||||