| ▲ | Galileo's handwritten notes found in ancient astronomy text(science.org) |
| 84 points by tzury 2 days ago | 13 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | macintux 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I have had the experience of serendipitous discovery when researching relatively recent history. To find Galileo’s handwriting 400 years later, effectively engaging in both agreement and debate with Ptolemy through the latter’s work… even though he specifically was looking for it, it still must have been surreal. |
| |
| ▲ | divbzero 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > even though he specifically was looking for it The historian was looking for conceptual connections between Ptolemy and Galileo, but the discovery of Galileo’s handwriting in Ptolemy’s book seemed to be a surprise. | | |
| ▲ | macintux 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I interpreted the fact that he was reviewing multiple copies of the same text as him searching for Galileo’s notes, but I suppose it’s possible that the motivation was the possibility of discrepancies between printings. |
| |
| ▲ | Diederich 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I have had the experience of serendipitous discovery when researching relatively recent history. I would really love to hear about this. (: | | |
| ▲ | macintux 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nothing all that exciting, just pleasure from finding a photo in a local newspaper of my great-great-grandfather’s (approximately, I don’t remember the specifics at the moment) car being pulled by horses out of a local river, or researching a family name I found in a cemetery and finding interesting tidbits about their history. Probably the most impressive effort I stumbled upon was a woman from rural Indiana who collected (and typed up) thousands of pages of local history & genealogy in the mid-20th century. Was interesting reading personal accounts of Morgan’s Raid, for example. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ffsm8 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not particularly important, but the title adding "handwritten" implies that they had non-handwritten notes too... |
| |
|
| ▲ | behnamoh 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's not "ancient". That word often means thousand(s) of years ago. |
| |
| ▲ | kgeist 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | >The pages belonged to The Almagest, in which second century polymath Claudius Ptolemy described his vision of an Earth-centered cosmos. Where's the article wrong? | |
| ▲ | jswelker 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I clicked just to make this same pedantic comment, fellow traveller. | |
| ▲ | ant6n 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | pedantry works best when correct. "Ancient history is a time period from the beginning of writing and recorded human history through late antiquity." Perhaps you are mixing up "ancient" and "prehistoric". |
|
|
| ▲ | mrose11 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| What a wild find. Good for the historian. |
