| ▲ | KaiserPister 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||
I am strongly put off by the LLM writing in this piece. It makes me question quality of the project before even attempting a download. Who would put effort into building this only to compose a low effort puff piece? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0xbadcafebee 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I wasn't put off by it. I read the article, got all the information I needed, it was interesting and informative. (In fact, I find the human-written ones more often annoying; most people are not good at writing, and are apt to create huge walls of text, whereas the AI is biased towards making the information easy to consume) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | neurostimulant 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
But isn't it normal for people who work on AI stuff to use LLMs for everything? They are very enthusiastic about AI so naturally they'll use it on everything they can. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ttul 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
What gives you the sense that the piece was written by an LLM? I would agree that the diagrams have some of the artifacts common in Nano Banana output, but what tips you off about the text? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | chromehearts 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I hate those AI generated graphs / charts more than the text | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||