|
| ▲ | jonhohle 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Win2K was my favorite as well. The transparency was tasteful. Everything worked and for the most part didn’t crash. Many (most?) games worked. It ran great on a PIII 600mhz. Everything good about NT4 was better and most of the consumer friendly stuff starting to take shape. The disc was even gorgeous. Peak MS design and engineering. |
| |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yep, favorite version of Windows ever. Even with Windows 7 and XP I switched the settings back so it looked like Win2K. | |
| ▲ | porl 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Win2k was the last one I was excited about. |
|
|
| ▲ | jsolson 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't remember if Plug-n-Play shipped with the original Windows 95 (it's certainly there in the final OSR), but that was a pretty big shift from the manual IRQ and port mapping days of DOS/Windows 3.1. |
| |
| ▲ | MBCook 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It did. That was one of its big features. It also was the first version to remove the 8.3 limitation and give us long file names. | | |
| ▲ | conception 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | They were fake long file names though. At the actual dos layer they were 8.3. And the plug and play was terrrrible. I always turned it off. Ugh the plug and play modems/soundcards were trash. | | |
| ▲ | jsolson 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You're not wrong, but PnP including the configuration basis for PCI which still sits at the config space layer of the latest and greatest PCIe. That's the piece I find so significant. I work with GPUs that mostly communicate over a proprietary C2C connection, but how does the OS find them? PCI enumeration. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dylan604 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | back then, it was still plug-n-pray. it didn't work as well as it was intended when it was first available |
|
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| IIRC we got long filenames with Win95, and a built-in network stack, no more Trumpet WinSock. And it did seem more stable, not nearly as good as NT/2000 but better than 3.1. |