| ▲ | zabzonk 10 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
they weren't promoting an OS, they were promoting a user experience - A GUI that competed with the Mac. There were OS improvements too, but I have forgot what. The real improvements came with Win2K - one of the best versions of Windows ever. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jonhohle 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Win2K was my favorite as well. The transparency was tasteful. Everything worked and for the most part didn’t crash. Many (most?) games worked. It ran great on a PIII 600mhz. Everything good about NT4 was better and most of the consumer friendly stuff starting to take shape. The disc was even gorgeous. Peak MS design and engineering. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jsolson 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't remember if Plug-n-Play shipped with the original Windows 95 (it's certainly there in the final OSR), but that was a pretty big shift from the manual IRQ and port mapping days of DOS/Windows 3.1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SoftTalker 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IIRC we got long filenames with Win95, and a built-in network stack, no more Trumpet WinSock. And it did seem more stable, not nearly as good as NT/2000 but better than 3.1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||