| ▲ | pixl97 4 hours ago |
| >LLMs can't be strategic because they do not understand the big picture While I do tend to believe you, what evidence based data do you have to prove this is true? |
|
| ▲ | gtowey 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > While I do tend to believe you, what evidence based data do you have to prove this is true? IMO the onus is to prove that they can be strategic. Otherwise you're asking me to prove a negative. |
| |
| ▲ | pixl97 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Saying the tiger has to prove it can eat you is not a great strategy to survive a tiger attack. | |
| ▲ | vonneumannstan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Task Time horizons are improving exponentially with doubling times around 4 months per METR. At what timescale would you accept that they "can be strategic"? Theres little reason to think they wont be at multi week or month time horizons very soon. Do you need to be strategic to complete multi month tasks? | | |
| ▲ | gtowey 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Can an LLM give you an upfront estimate that a task will take multiple months? Can it decide intelligently what it would have to change if you said "do what you can to have it ready in half the time?" |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Terr_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Prompt-injection in all its forms. If the hyper-mad-libs machine doesn't reliably "understand" and model the difference between internal and external words, how can we trust them to model fancier stuff? |
