Remix.run Logo
croisillon 6 hours ago

for the people who wouldn't have inadvertently clicked on the website: it's not real money, it's a campaign to nudge the German provider to care about their infamous delays

fnordian_slip 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's incredible that about 80% of people in this thread seem to be commenting without having looked at the website.

In defense of Deutsche Bahn, countries with comparable infrastructure but more reliable transport have put in about twice as much money per capita for the last 30 years at least.

Also, it went through a pseudo-privatisation back then, which hasn't helped (just private enough to focus on quarterly profits by letting bridges decay so that they have to be rebuilt or repaired in a few years, just public enough that they have to serve a lot of non-lucrative areas by law).

I have to admit I'm rather biased as I work there, but I would say most employees do the best they can with the hand they're dealt. It's just that politicians dealt them a really bad hand. And if Germany were to properly invest in infrastructure from now on, there's so much stuff that has to be repaired that reliability would go down even more in the next decade or so (seriously, this is not something you could fix in a year or two, even with hundreds of billions).

CaptainZapp 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> In defense of Deutsche Bahn, countries with comparable infrastructure but more reliable transport have put in about twice as much money per capita for the last 30 years at least.

Why is that "in defense?"

When you let your infrastructure rot away since the 90s of the last century for something as complex as a train network by brutally underinvesting.

Then you seriously fucked up. There's nothing to defend here.

hermanzegerman 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Because stupid people that vote blame the company and not the politicians that underinvest for years

sveme 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the defense is that it's the fault of the politicians (CDU/CSU, actually), as they are the ones allocating funds towards train infrastructure. The Deutsche Bahn is state-owned in all but name (which was one of the major fuckups of the last red-green government).

okanat 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Well people keep electing CxU. The current structure of DB is formed by Helmut Kohl cabinet which is CxU.

meetpaleltech 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

okanat 4 hours ago | parent [-]

"We elected right-wing parties who are against sane wages and unions and often use/exploit immigrants to depress wages while funneling billions into companies and away from infrastructure projects. So we decided to elect an even more right-wing party to blame immigrants while doing even more funneling away. It will definitely solve all the infrastructure problems that those penniless brown people and weird speaking ones caused."

rsynnott 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Investment isn't really down to DB, though; it's down to the government.

moresty an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> Why is that "in defense?"

Because DB does not decide its own budget. And we're literally living in times where their employees are getting attacked and verbally abused by the passengers for the state of the train system

throw0101a 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's incredible that about 80% of people in this thread seem to be commenting without having looked at the website.

Are you new to the Internet? This has been a thing since (at least) Slashdot. :)

yawniek 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes everyone does their best but in typical german fashion nobody does the right thing because it would mean to break some rules or habit. Its a general problem but it shows hard at DB.

trueismywork 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

As someone who is in a group who regularly trashes DB at will, no one blames the line employees, but definitely blame people in upper levels of management

zelphirkalt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I have to admit I'm rather biased as I work there, but I would say most employees do the best they can with the hand they're dealt.

I think most people don't blame the normal employees. The blame is on the management layers, the "Wasserkopf", that gives themselves boni, even if things are done poorly and are going badly. A disconnect from the reality on the tracks.

I don't see improvements. I rather see worse and worse reliability, even though Deutsche Bahn asks for more and more money from the government. That money is disappearing somewhere, at least partially, instead of arriving in projects for improving the situation. In many places, if not most, there isn't even a single turnout track, so that any construction work halts the whole line. Disastrous. You cannot ask people to buy train tickets for 100 to 200 EUR, and then be hours late. I mean, you can, but then you are delusional. They are not surviving because of their great product or service, they are only surviving, because people don't have good alternatives. Basically, it is extortion. In other countries I pay 1/10 of the ticket price and I arrive on friggin' time, on a much longer ride.

Schlagbohrer 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Privitisation is a huge curse, and a tremendous scam perpetuated by capitalist financiers. Where has it ever produced better results? No private entity can provide a service at cost like the government can.

lava_pidgeon 5 hours ago | parent [-]

SpaceX or rockets Generally, Telecom in Germany, flights in Europe, train transport in Japan and Italy.

moooo99 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Telecom in Germany

Telekom is a profitable enterprise. Yet, telecom infrastructure in Germany is on a remarkably bad level and relatively expensive. Cell coverage is also still bad, especially when travelling via rail or car.

With the exception if the Japanese Rail, all the other examples are different in one crucial detail: they are not natural monopolies.

flrlfmkhmem 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don’t think you’re aware of how bad the national railway has been managed in japan, they even went broke in the 80s with trillions in debt and had to split up sell off all their infrastructure and vehicles. That’s the reason why there’s often many non-interconnected competing stations at the same site today.

zelphirkalt 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yep, compared to other countries, Germany is almost third-world country, when it comes to reliable Internet service, and prices.

gzread 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Allowing private competition is generally good, but converting an existing state monopoly to a private corporation is generally bad.

hulitu 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Allowing private competition is generally good,

Except when they quickly build cartels. See internet in Germany.

DocTomoe 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I would not call telecommunications privatization in Germany a success story.

Yes, we can use more devices now. Prices have stayed more or less the same (or have risen, corrected by inflation. Service quality has collapsed, though.

tomalbrc 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> It's incredible that about 80% of people in this thread seem to be commenting without having looked at the website.

It’s almost as if people are tired of having betting shoved down their throats.

meetpaleltech 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> I work there

OMG. Employers to never work for:

- the Bund - the Oeffentlichen - Deutsche Bahn - Unions, especially ver.di - established / legacy parties

pantalaimon 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The problem is the infrastructure. There is already the Generalsanierung under way, it will take a decade and secure the status quo.

A lot of delays are due to rail corridors being at capacity, but overboarding bureaucracy makes any improvement there a generational project.

Hamburg - Hanover has been discussed for decades with strong opposition from NIMBY groups with no solution in sight.

But even if there is no opposition things take ages. E.g. for restoring the 2nd track and electrification between Cottbus and Görlitz the plan is now to finish the project by 2041.

This is absolutely insane for 100km of track that were removed as WW2 reparations.

And looking at previous projects it's unlikely to finish in time.

The new S-Bahn track in Berlin between the main station and Gesundbrunnen was supposed to open in 2017. It got delayed over and over and is now finally scheduled to open by the end of this month - just a delay of 9 years.

And that's with an interim station because the real station at Hauptbahnhof wasn't finished in time - and no intermediate stop, that's now also in the planning phase and will mean the line will have to be interrupted again in the near future

zelphirkalt 4 hours ago | parent [-]

When Generalsanierung is over, they can start again right away. That's just the maintenance/running cost. What is needed is building turnout tracks and other stuff to avoid delays. The delays turn people away from riding trains, or buying tickets. We want to combat climate change, but our train service is so bad, that people prefer to drive 4-person cars, alone, for hours, during which they need to be paying attention to the road at all times, instead of sitting in a train and relaxing, or getting stuff done, that they can do during the ride. There is something fundamentally wrong.

palata 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am pretty sure that they know about the delays. A nice thing about the Deutsche Bahn is that they exist. It's not the case in every country in the world.

Sure, they can improve, but it seems possible. The French SNCF has improved a lot in the last decade, for instance.

gzread 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is true. DB trains get me from one point to another point, and in my experience, are usually not more than a few hours delayed end-to-end.

Remember that if your train is delayed more than a certain amount (30 minutes?) you have the legal right to ignore the routing on your ticket and take any train you want, that leads towards the destination on your ticket. Consider it an adventure. The app can suggest alternative routes in real-time, and you can also ask at the info desk at any station that has one.

rsynnott 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> Remember that if your train is delayed more than a certain amount (30 minutes?) you have the legal right to ignore the routing on your ticket and take any train you want, that leads towards the destination on your ticket

There's definitely a comedy docudrama in there somewhere.

mafuy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nitpick: Unless it changed, you cannot upgrade from regional to interregional vehicles. You can upgrade from IC to ICE, though, and in general, the free choice of vehicle on your route is very useful.

trueismywork 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Huge number of people use DB for regional transport for commute. They get affected by 10 mins delay since connections are missed

mafuy an hour ago | parent [-]

The free choice of train does take this into account. You just need a (single!) ticket that, overall, will expectedly suffer from a delay long enough.

samiv 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You're actually not necessarily right.

At this point here in the south of Germany not having DB would be an improvement.

Now it exists and you might even try to take it just to be delayed and disappointed. You'll lose your money and they behave in their arrogant manner with impunity.

Their customer "service" will definitely tell you how it's your own fault for having had the nerve to actually try to take their train. You might have even carried some dirt to the train for Christs sake!

So yeah. Not having it would already be an improvement. You'd just shrug and move on and take an alternative transport. Even horse and carriage would be better.

palata 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I understand your frustration, and as I said they should improve (though that probably requires time and money). The SNCF shows that it is possible.

> Even horse and carriage would be better.

How does the existence of the DB prevent you from travelling with your horse and carriage? Your attitude doesn't seem very constructive, to be honest.

throw899832 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> A nice thing about the Deutsche Bahn is that they exist. It's not the case in every country in the world.

EU does not have a train monopoly. There are other train companies in Germany (FlixTrain, OBB, BRB...). And operators from other countries can also operate there, even French SNCF!

DB is blocking slots on rail, that could be used by other operators. And they are not going to change because it is Germany.

pantalaimon 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

All operators run on DB infrastructure.

I recently experienced this with CD from Karlovy Vary to Berlin. It was snowing that day and inside of the Czech Republic I was enjoying the scenic view of the Egerland without any delays.

But as soon as we pulled into Germany, the train came to a stop - problems with the rail security infrastructure, nothing the train operator has any influence on.

We eventually arrived in Berlin with +1h delay.

throw899832 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> All operators run on DB infrastructure.

Rails, buildings and train stations are in separate company (DB InfraGO), owned by DB.

But DB has no monopoly on trains in Germany, any company can run trains there.

palata 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My opinion is that trains are a natural monopoly, they should belong to the government.

Fine if some trains go through it (e.g. a TGV between Paris and Berlin).

zokier an hour ago | parent [-]

I can see rails being natural monopoly, but trains?

Aissen 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Thanks for the context. Since I'm not interested in betting, I had not clicked on the grey on white About link at the bottom, which says:

> All the trains, delays, and data on this app are real.But the money isn't – because for that I'd need to move to Malta. Or Cyprus. Or Schleswig-Holstein.

khafra 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wonder how hard it would be to get a court ruling or new law that DB is required to bet on every arrival, and make their bets public in easily-digestible formats like .csv

I'd really like to see that happen for the S-trains, as well--DB loves nothing more than continuing to project an on-time arrival on the station board, as the time of departure comes and goes and other trains arrive and depart.

tw-20260303-001 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

DB is a job program. Nobody at DB cares.

okanat 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Surprising but train drivers and operators also like to go home on time.

philipallstar 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The problem people have is the trains don't get them home on time.

littlecranky67 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For Deutsche Bahn, freelance contracting jobs in their IT famously always require 2+ years experience in train infrastructure companies as a hard requirement. Not joking, this is a common pattern in their job ads. Look at this ad, where they are looking for a Go/React/RabbitMQ expert: https://www.freelancermap.de/projekt/senior-fullstack-entwic...

joe_mamba 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Why is that an issue? It's a freelance gig, so you are free to ask for whatever requirements you want.

But I remember being interviewed for a cybersecurity job at Siemens's Trains division and the german guys there started grilling me on some obscure cybersecurity standards used by the rail industry, even though that was never in my pentest resume and it's something that can be learned on the job.

Germans really hate hiring people who don't 100% fit a job description no matter how impossible it is. No wonder their economy is stagnant, when it's based on HR box ticking instead of aptitudes.

littlecranky67 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because there is no other railway infrastructure company. They are looking for people they already employ.

joe_mamba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

What do you mean? How can they look hire people if they already employ them?

littlecranky67 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Exactly my point.

gzread 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's a problem because they don't get good employees and then they don't work well as a company.

joe_mamba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Maybe they don't want good employees, they want yes-men instead that don't rock the boat and keep the politics gravy train going for the C-suites.

Good employees are required for the private sector that has competition, not for pseudo-state controlled pseudo-monopolies.