Remix.run Logo
actionfromafar 7 hours ago

Sure, but still, the driver was very intoxicated and ran over the guy, then put the car in reverse and ran over the guy again.

joe_mamba 5 hours ago | parent [-]

What does the driver matter if the guy was already dead?

pjmlp 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I bet a judge would disagree on the inocence of the driver in such scenario.

joe_mamba 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You're missing the point to argue in bad faith. The point was the even if a drunk driver hadn't run over Nokia, they'd still be dead from the Android and iOS onslaught, doesn't matter who ran over their corpse after that. A judge won't make you a murderer for running over a corpse, just a drunk driver, this is such a weird hill to die on.

BTW, we're still waiting on the Nokia insider details you were mentioning before.

pjmlp 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I won't spill any beans, some stuff is easy to find online, the other I usually keep my NDAs.

Nokia is still pretty much around, and owns where UNIX was born in case you missed that part of history.

While we had issues, the burning memo platform was the killer for the third party developer ecosystem, just coming around the hill to move from classical Symbian into Qt/PIPS, in a UNIX culture, to be told to go Windows.

joe_mamba 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Hold on a second, let's backtrack. First you say you can "tell stories about the factory rampdowns", then when pressed to tell those stories you say you can't "because of NDAs" .... from 20 years ago on a business that's now defunct ... not sure how any of that would be enforceable today, leading me to believe you're either chasing clout for upvotes, or bs-ing. But OK, sure, let's ignore all that for now and move to the next point.

Secondly, you keep bringing up Stephen Elop's "burning memo" several times in this thread as the root cause of Nokia's failure, but when i use my google-fu to go back to the world of 2011, I see that Symbian had fallen to 31% market share from 44% the previous year and Maemo/Meego had a <1% market share, so it's clear to anyone with two brain cells to rub together than Symbian was in freefall and irredeemable against iOS and Android, and loosing them money, and Maemo/Meego was far too late to the party with an insignificant market share to rise up against iOS and Android, also loosing them money. So given this obvious loose-money loose-money situation Nokia was in, why wasn't the "burning memo" to stop the bleed, the right choice at the time?

People say this was the wrong solution, but nobody ever says what the right solution was. Maybe because they don't have a better solution, and burning it was the only right one. So you're probably looking at the unsalvageable past through rose tinted glasses.

pjmlp 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I guess it is too hard to find stuff like,

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2008-01-17/germany-r...

Followed by a couple of years later,

https://balkaninsight.com/2011/09/30/nokia-leaves-romania-in...

Or I might suggest reading stuff like https://yle.fi/a/3-6886400

The rest, think whatever you feel like.