Here's one, basically AI is driving 15% of Google's profits at the end of 2025.

https://advergroup.com/gemini-hits-650-million-users/

I didn't really realize how big Gemini was until I saw that Qualia was using it, they apparently used 0.01% of Geminis total tokens (100 billion) in about 3 months, they're in production with the title and escrow industry, so that's a great deal of data going through Gemini, unlike some chat subscription this is all API driven, which I doubt Google is charging at a loss for.

https://www.qualia.com/qualia-clear/

Unlike OpenAI, Google has an actual business model, not just strange circular deals.

Edit: I misswrote "majority of" instead of 15% of Google's profits.

▲

famouswaffles 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Here's one, basically AI is driving 15% of Google's profits at the end of 2025. https://advergroup.com/gemini-hits-650-million-users/

This does not at all tell us Gemini is profitable or driving 15% of its profits. The article does not mention profits even once. It then goes on to bizarrely compare Gemini's monthly active users to Open AI's weekly active ones.

	▲	hogwasher 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Indeed, that article doesn't support a single part of that claim. It kinda feels like an LLM-generated article that another LLM picked as a "citation", and then no human bothered to check if it actually said what the LLM said it did. And, really, advergroup.com? Who sites an advertising agency as if it's a reliable resource? https://advergroup.com/digital-marketing/ "AdverGroup Web Design and Creative Media Solutions is a full service advertising agency that delivers digital marketing services. We manage Google Ad Word campaigns and/or Meta Ad Campaigns for local clients in Chicago, Las Vegas and their surrounding suburbs." So credible a resource on Gemini's performance/profitability... /sarc But yeah it doesn't even actually say anything about profits, let alone attribute any specific percentage of profits to Gemini. It just vague marketing copy.