| ▲ | thinkingtoilet 8 hours ago | |||||||
Only $730B? Why stop there? As long as we're making stuff up, let's go big. What about $10T? | ||||||||
| ▲ | muzani 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They have to save the big T for IPO. On a tangent, I remember companies like Slack triggering the unicorn craze. They said that it was just better to aim for a billion than some number like 900M or 1.2B, because psychologically, it meant more to employees, investors, and customers. OpenAI is in that place where nobody really cares for these mind games. It's not very reliable. But it is useful enough to pay for. It's cheap enough to be an impulse purchase where some guy decides to just subscribe to ChatGPT because they're working on an important slide or sketching a logo. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sunaookami 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Rookie numbers, I say $100T. Go big or go home. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | etyhhgfff 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
You have to make it look semi-realistic | ||||||||
| ▲ | outside1234 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Remember when it was a huge milestone when gigantic companies like Apple and Microsoft were striving to be the first $1T company backed with decades of building actual businesses with actual profit? Good times. | ||||||||