| ▲ | whynotmaybe 3 hours ago |
| >fake OF models Soon many real OF models will be out of job when everyone will be able to produce content to their personal taste from a few prompts. |
|
| ▲ | mjr00 21 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Even ignoring the model censorship making high quality sexual imagery/videos not possible, this is a crazy take. You think OF models are making money because it's the only way to see a nude man/woman with particular characteristics on the internet? You're completely misunderstanding what the product being sold is. |
| |
| ▲ | mfkp 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If you don't think that OF models are using AI to reply to incoming chats from users, well I've got a bridge to sell ya. |
|
|
| ▲ | sodacanner 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People already have access to every form of niche pornography they could dare to imagine (for absolutely free!), I really doubt that 'personal taste' is the part that makes OF models their money. They'll be fine. |
| |
| ▲ | sosodev 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think you're under-estimating how much personal taste applies in that industry. Yes, there's a lot of free content but it's often low quality and/or difficult to find for a particular niche. The OF pages, and other paid sites, are curated collections of high quality stuff that can satisfy particular cravings repeatedly with minimal effort. A big part of it also the feeling of "connection" with the creator via messages and what not, but that too can be replicated (arguably better) by AI. In fact, a lot of those messages are already being generated haha. | | |
| ▲ | deklesen a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | For a podcast on this topic (niche pornography and how it was affected by the advent of pornhub and the likes) check out "the butterfly effect" | |
| ▲ | sodacanner 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I was mostly hinting towards the 'connection' part of it, yes - I think that's really where the money is made more than anything else. That's the part that'll start killing the industry once some company tunes it in. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pousada 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You can’t really because these powerful models are censored.
You can create lewd pictures with open models but they aren’t nearly as good or easy to use. |
| |
| ▲ | dragonwriter 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Because models can be used to alter existing images, you can use open and commercial models together in content creation workflows (and also the available findings of open models, and the ability to further tube them very specific used, are quite powerful on their own), so the censorship on the commercial models has a lot less effect on what motivated people can produce than you might think. I still think, even with that, that like most predictions of AI taking over any content industries, the short-term predictions are overblown. | |
| ▲ | coffeebeqn 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’ve seen some very high quality NSFW AI video in the last few months. Those models are not far behind and the search and training space for porn is smaller than being able to generate anything | |
| ▲ | sosodev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Doesn't Grok allow users to create lewd content or did they roll that back? Also, I suspect that we'll soon see the same pattern of open weights models following several months behind frontier in every modality not just text. It's just too easy for other labs to produce synthetic training data from the frontier models and then mimic their behavior. They'll never be as good, but they will certainly be good enough. | |
| ▲ | infecto 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Just a matter of time and open models will get there. Not once have we seen a moat across the model spectrums. |
|
|
| ▲ | baal80spam 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And this can't come soon enough. |
| |
|
| ▲ | sekai 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Soon many real OF models will be out of job when everyone will be able to produce content to their personal taste from a few prompts. net positive to society |
| |
| ▲ | fwip an hour ago | parent [-] | | In what way? Certainly not for the models, who lose their income/job. Probably not better for the consumer, either. | | |
| ▲ | blibble 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | or the taxpayer the high end probably pay the same sort of tax as professional footballers |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dfxm12 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't think so. Talking to people in this space, I've found out about broad camps. There are probably more: -They simply aren't into real women/men (so you couldn't even pay a model to do what they're looking for). -They want to play out fantasies that would be hard to coordinate even if you could pay models (I guess this is more on the video side of things, but a string of photos can put be together into a comic) -They want to generate imagery that would be illegal Based on this, I would guess fetish artists (as in illustrators) are more at risk than OF models. However, AI isn't free. Depending on what you're looking for, commissions might be cheaper still for quite a while... |
| |
|
| ▲ | coldtea 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And they might have to gasp! get an honest job! |
| |
| ▲ | switchbak 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't know much about that side of things, but I presume that's hard work! Maybe not always so honest though. | |
| ▲ | xfeeefeee 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's a pretty wide brush you are painting with there |
|
